Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Chemicals - Specialty
MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $837M | $225M | $4.30B | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $784M | $353M | $3.15B | $1.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $47M | $327M | $117M |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 96.7% | 50.1% | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 50.5% | 23.5% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 8.0x | 10.5x | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $379M | $316M | $4.56B | $90M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $202M | $72M | $293M |
MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myers Industries, I… (MYE) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1219.1 | +1119.1% |
| Innospec Inc. (IOSP) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.3%, EPS growth 389.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- +97.8% vs IOSP's -14.9%
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs IOSP's -3.7%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 15.5x)
ENVA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs MYE's 95.4%
IOSP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 6.7%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.70 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage
- 6.5% ROA vs MFIN's 1.6%, ROIC 11.2% vs 17.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs IOSP's -3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs MYE's 5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IOSP's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.8% vs IOSP's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs MFIN's 1.6%, ROIC 11.2% vs 17.2% |
MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOSP leads 1 • ENVA leads 1 • MYE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 8.9x MFIN's $353M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYE's 5.4%. On growth, IOSP holds the edge at -2.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $784M | $353M | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $111M | $815M | $198M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | $47M | $327M | $117M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $126M | $1.9B | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +96.7% | +50.1% | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +50.5% | +23.5% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +12.2% | +9.8% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +35.7% | +56.2% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | — | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.8% | +16.3% | +28.6% | +167.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 78% valuation discount to MYE's 24.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENVA's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $837M | $225M | $4.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $340M | $8.8B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.06x | 5.37x | 14.90x | 16.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.34x | 7.97x | 10.49x | 15.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.38x | 1.90x | 11.26x | 8.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 0.64x | 1.37x | 1.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.86x | 0.46x | 3.40x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.46x | 1.78x | 2.43x | 21.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $9 for IOSP. IOSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs MYE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.5% | +9.4% | +24.9% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +1.6% | +5.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +17.2% | +10.4% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +10.0% | +13.5% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 0.62x | 3.41x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | $115M | $4.5B | -$203M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $202M | $72M | $293M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $379M | $316M | $4.6B | $90M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.39x | 1.07x | 79.01x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $46,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,168 for IOSP. Over the past 12 months, MYE leads with a +97.8% total return vs IOSP's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs IOSP's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.0% | -4.9% | +6.5% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.8% | +8.2% | +87.8% | -14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +58.9% | +302.0% | -17.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.0% | +23.2% | +368.1% | -18.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +60.3% | +2034.9% | +84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | +16.7% | +59.0% | -6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENVA and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IOSP is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs IOSP's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.15x | 1.48x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.25 | $11.00 | $176.68 | $95.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.39 | $7.88 | $89.00 | $65.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +86.9% | +97.6% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 55.0 | 65.4 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 214K | 59K | 227K | 221K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFIN and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYE as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy", IOSP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for IOSP (target: $115) vs 15.7% for ENVA (target: $200). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs IOSP's 2.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | — | $199.50 | $115.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +4.7% | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $0.45 | — | $1.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | +5.0% | 0.0% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IOSP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MYE vs MFIN vs ENVA vs IOSP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Innospec Inc. (IOSP). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Myers Industries, Inc. at 24. 1x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to -18. 3% for Innospec Inc. (IOSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 3% versus MFIN's +60. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 112% more volatile than IOSP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -3. 7% for Innospec Inc. (IOSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Myers Industries, Inc. grew EPS 389. 5% year-over-year, compared to 17. 1% for Medallion Financial Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYE leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP?
Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 4. 2% for Myers Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 8. 8% for IOSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Myers Industries, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOSP: 50. 1% to $115. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), MYE (2. 4% yield), IOSP (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ENVA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MYE or MFIN or ENVA or IOSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IOSP: +84. 4%, ENVA: +20. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYE and MFIN and ENVA and IOSP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MYE (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services) and ENVA (Financial Services) and IOSP (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock. MYE, MFIN, IOSP pay a dividend while ENVA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.