Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAK logo
NAK
HBM logo
HBM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAK vs HBM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+42.7%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$11.04B
5Y Perf.+818.2%

NAK vs HBM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAK logoNAK
HBM logoHBM
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsCopper
Market Cap$1.14B$11.04B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.22B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$570M
Gross Margin32.5%
Operating Margin41.4%
Forward P/E17.0x
Total Debt$3M$1.09B
Cash & Equiv.$55M$568M

NAK vs HBMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAK
HBM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK)100142.7+42.7%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)100918.2+818.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAK vs HBM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HBM leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇HBM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
The Income Pick

NAK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 2.42
  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs HBM's 443.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.42, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.55x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
The Growth Play

HBM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
  • 25.8% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
  • 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAK logoNAK43.8% revenue growth vs HBM's 8.9%
Quality / MarginsHBM logoHBM25.8% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
Stability / SafetyNAK logoNAKBeta 2.42 vs HBM's 2.49, lower leverage
DividendsHBM logoHBM0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HBM logoHBM+189.7% vs NAK's +65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HBM logoHBM9.8% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs -68.7%

NAK vs HBM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHBMLAGGINGNAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HBM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

HBM and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$570M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$215M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+146.8%+5.1%
HBM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NAK and HBM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$11.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$11.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.01x19.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share88.49x3.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF55.79x
Evenly matched — NAK and HBM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HBM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HBM delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBM's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBM scores 5/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-98.8%+19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.3%+9.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.7%+12.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.1%+11.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$52M$524M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$568M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-74.40x13.44x
HBM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NAK and HBM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HBM five years ago would be worth $40,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $37,004 for NAK. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +189.7% total return vs NAK's +65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.7% vs HBM's 81.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.6%+38.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.9%+189.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+834.9%+498.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+270.0%+300.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+514.1%+443.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+110.7%+81.5%
Evenly matched — NAK and HBM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NAK and HBM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NAK is the less volatile stock with a 2.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBM currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 68.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.98$32.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$8.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.5%+86.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.451.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.9M5.3M
Evenly matched — NAK and HBM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates NAK as "Buy" and HBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for HBM (target: $30) vs -36.3% for NAK (target: $1).

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.30$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts520
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HBM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallHudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAK vs HBM: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAK or HBM a better buy right now?

Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or HBM?

Over the past 5 years, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) delivered a total return of +300. 3%, compared to +270. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NAK returned +514. 1% versus HBM's +443. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NAK or HBM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

(NAK) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 42β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning HBM is approximately 3% more volatile than NAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 34% for Hudbay Minerals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NAK or HBM?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc.

grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NAK or HBM?

Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBM leads at 25. 5% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBM leads at 29. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NAK or HBM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBM: 7.

8% to $30. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NAK or HBM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is NAK or HBM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

(NAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+514. 1% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAK: +514. 1%, HBM: +443. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NAK and HBM?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.