Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAKA logo
NAKA
WELL logo
WELL
VTR logo
VTR
OPRX logo
OPRX
OHI logo
OHI
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAKA
Nakamoto Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$79M
5Y Perf.-96.3%
WELL
Welltower Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$149.11B
5Y Perf.+105.3%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.68B
5Y Perf.+66.1%
OPRX
OptimizeRx Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
OHI
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$13.46B
5Y Perf.+39.8%

NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAKA logoNAKA
WELL logoWELL
VTR logoVTR
OPRX logoOPRX
OHI logoOHI
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsREIT - Healthcare FacilitiesREIT - Healthcare FacilitiesMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesREIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$79M$149.11B$39.68B$100M$13.46B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$11.63B$6.13B$107M$1.24B
Net Income (TTM)$-290M$1.43B$260M$7M$632M
Gross Margin-376.0%39.1%-4.3%69.0%85.5%
Operating Margin-82.2%4.4%13.4%13.6%64.3%
Forward P/E73.5x133.8x5.6x22.7x
Total Debt$210M$21.38B$13.22B$26M$4.26B
Cash & Equiv.$23M$5.03B$741M$23M$27M

NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAKA
WELL
VTR
OPRX
OHI
StockMay 24Jun 26Return
Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA)1003.7-96.3%
Welltower Inc. (WELL)100205.3+105.3%
Ventas, Inc. (VTR)100166.1+66.1%
OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX)10044.1-55.9%
Omega Healthcare In… (OHI)100139.8+39.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WELL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. OPRX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇WELL emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAKA
Nakamoto Inc.
The Financial Services Pick

NAKA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 1.3%
  • Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • 229.1% 10Y total return vs OHI's 117.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.04, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, VTR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
OPRX
OptimizeRx Corporation
The Value Play

OPRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (5.6x vs 22.7x)
Best for: value
OHI
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 51.0% margin vs NAKA's -74.0%
  • 6.1% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -42.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWELL logoWELL35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0%
ValueOPRX logoOPRXLower P/E (5.6x vs 22.7x)
Quality / MarginsOHI logoOHI51.0% margin vs NAKA's -74.0%
Stability / SafetyWELL logoWELLBeta 0.04 vs NAKA's 2.88
DividendsWELL logoWELL1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs OHI's 5.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)WELL logoWELL+43.3% vs NAKA's -99.3%
Efficiency (ROA)OHI logoOHI6.1% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -42.1%

NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAKANakamoto Inc.
FY 2025
Product Retail Sales
100.0%$1,479
WELLWelltower Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Housing - Operating
81.1%$8.5B
Triple Net
11.4%$1.2B
Outpatient Medical
7.5%$782M
VTRVentas, Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Living Operations
74.0%$4.3B
Outpatient Medical And Research Portfolio
15.5%$898M
Triple Net Leased Properties
10.4%$602M
OPRXOptimizeRx Corporation
FY 2025
Other Revenue
100.0%$215,000
OHIOmega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
FY 2011
CommuniCare Health Services
53.5%$39M
Sun Health Care Group, Inc
46.5%$34M

NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOPRXLAGGINGVTR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 2967.2x NAKA's $4M. OHI is the more profitable business, keeping 51.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAKA's -74.0%. On growth, NAKA holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…OHI logoOHIOmega Healthcare …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$11.6B$6.1B$107M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$320M$2.8B$2.3B$19M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$290M$1.4B$260M$7M$632M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$46M$2.5B$1.4B$14M$912M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.8%+39.1%-4.3%+69.0%+85.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-82.2%+4.4%+13.4%+13.6%+64.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-74.0%+12.3%+4.2%+6.4%+51.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.7%+21.9%+22.4%+13.4%+73.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%+40.3%+22.0%-9.5%+16.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-88.4%+22.5%0.0%+78.0%+42.4%
OHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.7x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 87% valuation discount to VTR's 154.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.3x.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…OHI logoOHIOmega Healthcare …
Market CapShares × price$79M$149.1B$39.7B$100M$13.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$266M$165.5B$52.2B$103M$17.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.43x153.11x154.56x19.70x23.30x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.73.47x133.75x5.65x22.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.00x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple66.35x23.65x6.26x16.46x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue43.19x13.98x6.80x0.91x11.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.10x3.35x3.07x0.79x2.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF52.36x30.14x5.35x15.32x
OPRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OPRX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

OHI delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-85 for NAKA. OPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTR's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs NAKA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…OHI logoOHIOmega Healthcare …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-84.8%+3.5%+2.1%+5.5%+11.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-56.5%+2.3%+1.0%+4.0%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.1%+0.5%+2.5%+6.8%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-76.2%+0.6%+3.2%+7.8%+7.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.49x1.05x0.20x0.78x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$187M$16.3B$12.5B$3M$4.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$5.0B$741M$23M$27M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$210M$21.4B$13.2B$26M$4.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-24.72x0.26x1.40x2.84x3.83x
OPRX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $27,819 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for NAKA. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.3% total return vs NAKA's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 40.2% vs NAKA's -66.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…OHI logoOHIOmega Healthcare …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-72.3%+14.6%+8.6%-57.2%+4.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.3%+43.3%+36.0%-61.4%+32.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%+175.6%+93.0%-64.6%+70.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%+178.2%+58.5%-89.8%+58.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%+229.1%+53.2%+56.9%+117.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-66.6%+40.2%+24.5%-29.2%+19.5%
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WELL and OHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAKA's 2.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NAKA's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…OHI logoOHIOmega Healthcare …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.88x0.04x-0.11x2.18x-0.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$679.20$221.68$91.06$22.25$49.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.38$148.97$61.76$4.57$35.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.7%+96.0%+91.7%+23.9%+91.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.455.650.746.148.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded274K2.6M3.6M442K2.1M
Evenly matched — WELL and OHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WELL and OHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NAKA as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", OPRX as "Buy", OHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 219.5% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 12.2% for OHI (target: $51). For income investors, OHI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.56% vs WELL's 1.30%.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…OHI logoOHIOmega Healthcare …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$239.11$96.25$17.00$50.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts234321528
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+2.2%+5.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.76$1.86$2.51
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — WELL and OHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). OHI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallOptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAKA vs WELL vs VTR vs OPRX vs OHI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI?

On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 19.

7x versus Ventas, Inc. at 154. 6x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI?

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +178. 2%, compared to -96. 3% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +229. 1% versus NAKA's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.

(OHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 21β versus Nakamoto Inc. 's 2. 88β — meaning NAKA is approximately -1476% more volatile than OHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 105% for Ventas, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1452. 2% for Nakamoto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI?

Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.

(OHI) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -28. 7% for Nakamoto Inc. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OHI leads at 62. 6% versus -108. 2% for NAKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OPRX leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 5.

6x forward P/E versus 133. 8x for Ventas, Inc. — 128. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 219. 5% to $17. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI?

In this comparison, OHI (5.

6% yield), VTR (2. 2% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NAKA, OPRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAKA or WELL or VTR or OPRX or OHI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.

(OHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 21), 5. 6% yield, +117. 7% 10Y return). Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OHI: +117. 7%, NAKA: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAKA and WELL and VTR and OPRX and OHI?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAKA (Financial Services) and WELL (Real Estate) and VTR (Real Estate) and OPRX (Healthcare) and OHI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; OHI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. WELL, VTR, OHI pay a dividend while NAKA, OPRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.