Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $15.01B | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.10B | $0.00 | $1.56B | $4.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $669M | $-168M | $153M | $-1.82B |
| Gross Margin | 98.2% | — | 65.4% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | — | 12.3% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | — | 24.8x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $415M | $22M | $70M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $713M | $194M | $1.12B | $532M |
NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurocrine Bioscien… (NBIX) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 41.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 233.2% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.39x
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 3.39x
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs PRGO's -51.2%
ALKS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 24.8x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBIX leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • ALKS leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBIX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. NBIX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, NBIX holds the edge at +42.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $0 | $1.6B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $811M | -$112M | $212M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $669M | -$168M | $153M | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $831M | -$151M | $392M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.2% | — | +65.4% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | — | +12.3% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | — | +9.8% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | — | +25.1% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.2% | — | +28.2% | -7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.9% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -56.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 23% valuation discount to NBIX's 32.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NBIX's 22.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.0B | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.7B | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.03x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -1.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.07x | — | — | 5.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.69x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.67x | — | 17.25x | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.25x | — | 4.00x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.71x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.05x | — | 12.28x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBIX delivers a 21.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.6% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.1% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | — | +18.9% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $713M | $194M | $1.1B | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $415M | $22M | $70M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 32.30x | -7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBIX five years ago would be worth $16,431 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBIX at 15.2% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.0% | +110.4% | +16.5% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.8% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.3% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +233.2% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBIX and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $160.18 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $28.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.66 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $9.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.6 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 252K | 2.3M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBIX as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 19.1% for NBIX (target: $178). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $178.09 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 15 | 28 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
NBIX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NBIX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
(NBIX) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. at 32. 0x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO?
Over the past 5 years, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
(NBIX) delivered a total return of +64. 3%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBIX returned +233. 2% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
(NBIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 66% more volatile than NBIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
(NBIX) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 41. 9% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NBIX leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO?
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
(NBIX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBIX leads at 21. 6% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBIX leads at 98. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NBIX, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NBIX or DBVT or ALKS or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
(NBIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), +233. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBIX: +233. 2%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBIX and DBVT and ALKS and PRGO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBIX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO pays a dividend while NBIX, DBVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.