Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NBN vs FUNC vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
NBN vs FUNC vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.04B | $272M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $120M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $25M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | 70.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.3% | 27.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 9.7x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $115M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $132M | $10.27B |
NBN vs FUNC vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast Bank (NBN) | 100 | 740.3 | +640.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBN vs FUNC vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.7%, EPS growth 33.0%
- 11.4% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
- PEG 0.34 vs KO's 2.26
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 56.4%, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.09x
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs FUNC's 20.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
- 13.1% ROA vs FUNC's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FUNC's 20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs NBN's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.3% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs FUNC's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.1% |
NBN vs FUNC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBN vs FUNC vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FUNC and KO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 412.4x FUNC's $120M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUNC's 20.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $120M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $131M | $35M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | $25M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $16M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.4% | +70.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +27.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +20.5% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +13.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +20.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 59% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBN offers better value at 0.40x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $272M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $962M | $255M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.89x | 11.11x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.74x | 9.66x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.40x | 0.85x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 7.85x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.95x | 2.28x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.18x | 1.34x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.40x | 17.67x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $13 for FUNC. FUNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs NBN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +12.6% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.0% | +7.1% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +9.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.56x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$74M | -$17M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $132M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $115M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 0.99x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBN five years ago would be worth $44,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, NBN leads with a +52.3% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBN at 47.2% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | +14.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.3% | +44.4% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.1% | +192.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +340.6% | +141.9% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1136.4% | +361.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.2% | +43.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FUNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUNC currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs NBN's 95.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.67x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $135.62 | $42.35 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.45 | $28.00 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +98.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 71.6 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 13K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBN as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.6% upside for NBN (target: $145) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs FUNC's 2.19%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $145.00 | $25.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +2.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.92 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). FUNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NBN vs FUNC vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBN or FUNC or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the stronger pick with 34.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northeast Bank (NBN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBN or FUNC or KO?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Bank wins at 0. 34x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBN or FUNC or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Bank (NBN) delivered a total return of +340.
6%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBN returned +1136% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBN or FUNC or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Northeast Bank's 1. 03β — meaning NBN is approximately -614% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First United Corporation (FUNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBN or FUNC or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northeast Bank (NBN) is pulling ahead at 34.
7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northeast Bank grew EPS 33. 0% year-over-year, compared to 19. 7% for First United Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBN or FUNC or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 20. 6% for First United Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBN leads at 35. 8% versus 27. 3% for FUNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBN or FUNC or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBN: 11. 6% to $145. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBN or FUNC or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NBN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NBN or FUNC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NBN: +1136%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBN and FUNC and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NBN (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NBN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FUNC, KO pay a dividend while NBN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.