Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NBP
NovaBridge Biosciences

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$416M
5Y Perf.-91.1%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.58B
5Y Perf.-38.4%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.+63.2%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.69B
5Y Perf.-74.4%

NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NBP logoNBP
ARQT logoARQT
INVA logoINVA
NKTR logoNKTR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$416M$2.58B$1.93B$1.69B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$416M$424M$55M
Net Income (TTM)$-25M$-2M$504M$-164M
Gross Margin90.9%76.2%99.6%
Operating Margin0.8%14.8%-237.9%
Forward P/E77.6x11.9x
Total Debt$4M$6M$269M$149M
Cash & Equiv.$68M$43M$551M$15M

NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NBP
ARQT
INVA
NKTR
StockMay 20May 26Return
NovaBridge Bioscien… (NBP)1008.9-91.1%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10061.6-38.4%
Innoviva, Inc. (INVA)100163.2+63.2%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10025.6-74.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INVA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. NKTR also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NBP
NovaBridge Biosciences
The Income Pick

NBP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.25
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 20.90x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs NBP's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 94.9% 10Y total return vs ARQT's -5.2%
  • Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 118.9% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Momentum Pick

NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +8.2% vs INVA's +21.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs NBP's -100.0%
ValueINVA logoINVABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINVA logoINVA118.9% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
Stability / SafetyINVA logoINVABeta 0.13 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+8.2% vs INVA's +21.7%
Efficiency (ROA)INVA logoINVA32.4% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs -57.2%

NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NBPNovaBridge Biosciences
FY 2023
Licensing and Collaboration
60.8%$17M
Supply Of Investigational Products
39.2%$11M
ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
INVAInnoviva, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
57.5%$236M
Product
41.8%$172M
License And Other Revenue
0.7%$3M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000

NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINVALAGGINGARQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

INVA and NBP operate at a comparable scale, with $424M and $0 in trailing revenue. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNBP logoNBPNovaBridge Biosci…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$416M$424M$55M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$33M$6M$86M-$130M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$2M$504M-$164M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$27M$181M-$209M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.9%+76.2%+99.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.8%+14.8%-2.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.6%+118.9%-3.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.5%+42.8%-3.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.1%+10.6%-25.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+73.0%+55.0%+4.0%-4.5%
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INVA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricNBP logoNBPNovaBridge Biosci…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$416M$2.6B$1.9B$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$407M$2.5B$1.7B$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.39x-158.92x6.91x-8.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.77.64x11.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.87x4.55x30.64x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.10x13.87x1.65x15.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.88x
INVA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INVA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. NBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBP scores 5/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNBP logoNBPNovaBridge Biosci…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.5%-1.4%+46.5%-4.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.8%-0.6%+32.4%-62.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.2%+14.2%-57.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-31.2%-4.3%+12.4%-55.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95452
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.03x0.23x1.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$64M-$37M-$282M$134M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$68M$43M$551M$15M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$6M$269M$149M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.08x63.45x-4.74x
INVA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for NBP. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs INVA's +21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs NBP's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNBP logoNBPNovaBridge Biosci…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-48.0%-28.8%+14.7%+92.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+149.4%+50.8%+21.7%+818.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-26.5%+44.9%+95.2%+621.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%-39.5%+94.4%-72.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.2%-5.2%+94.9%-59.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-9.7%+13.2%+25.0%+93.3%
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs NBP's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNBP logoNBPNovaBridge Biosci…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.25x1.48x0.13x1.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.79$31.77$25.15$109.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.83$12.42$16.52$7.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+65.0%+90.7%+76.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.154.339.953.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M1.3M621K991K
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NBP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NBP as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", INVA as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 305.4% upside for NBP (target: $9) vs 59.3% for NKTR (target: $133).

MetricNBP logoNBPNovaBridge Biosci…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.00$35.50$37.67$132.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts11121033
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%
NBP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

INVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallInnoviva, Inc. (INVA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NBP vs ARQT vs INVA vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR?

On forward P/E, Innoviva, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR?

Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -96. 3% for NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +94. 9% versus NBP's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 1366% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR?

Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 77. 6x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 65. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBP: 305. 4% to $9. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NBP or ARQT or INVA or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NBP and ARQT and INVA and NKTR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NBP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARQT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INVA

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 71%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NKTR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NBP and ARQT and INVA and NKTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NBP: -100.0% · ARQT: 60.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.