Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NBR vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
NBR vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $1.59B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.18B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $263M | $-410M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | 5.8x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.57B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $941M | $98M |
NBR vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nabors Industries L… (NBR) | 100 | 123.0 | +23.0% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBR vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 176.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.8x)
- 8.3% margin vs SOC's -5.1%
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.51
- 38.2% 10Y total return vs NBR's -67.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, current ratio 0.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.6% revenue growth vs NBR's 8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs SOC's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs NBR's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +277.3% vs SOC's -32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs SOC's -24.4%, ROIC 6.2% vs -44.6% |
NBR vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBR vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBR and SOC operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | -$395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $263M | -$410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | -$640M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.5% | -138.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NBR and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.79x | -3.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.52x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 2464.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBR delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-102 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBR scores 7/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.8% | -102.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -24.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.78x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $941M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | -3.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,825 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,845 for NBR. Over the past 12 months, NBR leads with a +277.3% total return vs SOC's -32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 9.7% vs NBR's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +79.5% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +277.3% | -32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.5% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | +38.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBR and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOC is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBR's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBR currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 38.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.80 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.27 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +38.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.5 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 349K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NBR as "Hold" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 101.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -18.5% for NBR (target: $81). NBR is the only dividend payer here at 0.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NBR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NBR vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBR or SOC a better buy right now?
Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NBR or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +38. 2%, compared to +8. 5% for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus NBR's -67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NBR or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Nabors Industries Ltd. 's 1. 53β — meaning NBR is approximately 1% more volatile than SOC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NBR or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nabors Industries Ltd.
grew EPS 176. 7% year-over-year, compared to 40. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NBR or SOC?
Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBR leads at 8. 3% versus 0. 0% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBR leads at 19. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NBR or SOC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 101.
3% to $27. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NBR or SOC?
In this comparison, NBR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NBR or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOC: +32. 4%, NBR: -67. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NBR and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.