NCI vs BTBT

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 35. 3% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited at 21. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) delivered a total return of -82. 8%, compared to -97. 6% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -61. 0% versus NCI's -97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the lower-risk stock at -1.

10β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately -411% more volatile than NCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 122% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 35. 3% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 81. 8% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus 3. 4% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus 4. 9% for NCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. NCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.

10)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCI: -97. 1%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NCI (Consumer Cyclical) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.