Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NCL vs TILE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
NCL vs TILE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $116M |
| Gross Margin | -15.8% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -114.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $265M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245K | $71M |
NCL vs TILE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northann Corp. (NCL) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Interface, Inc. (TILE) | 100 | 309.9 | +209.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCL vs TILE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.57
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 51.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -23.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 0.61x
TILE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 74.9% 10Y total return vs NCL's -99.6%
- 8.4% margin vs NCL's -135.6%
- 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs TILE's 5.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs NCL's -135.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs TILE's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs NCL's -95.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs NCL's -117.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs -16.4% |
NCL vs TILE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCL vs TILE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TILE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TILE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 106.7x NCL's $13M. TILE is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCL's -135.6%. On growth, NCL holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $116M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $122M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -114.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -135.6% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.2% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.6% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | +10.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NCL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.86x | 14.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TILE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TILE delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NCL. TILE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCL's 2.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.6% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -117.9% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.4% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -67.4% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.56x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245,164 | $71M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $265M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -72.01x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TILE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TILE five years ago would be worth $19,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for NCL. Over the past 12 months, TILE leads with a +39.1% total return vs NCL's -95.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TILE at 57.3% vs NCL's -84.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.5% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.6% | +39.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +289.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +74.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.2% | +57.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCL and TILE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TILE's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TILE currently trades 78.5% from its 52-week high vs NCL's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.16 | $35.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $18.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 272K | 572K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TILE is the only dividend payer here at 0.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
TILE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NCL vs TILE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCL or TILE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Interface, Inc. (TILE). Interface, Inc. (TILE) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NCL or TILE?
Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Northann Corp. (NCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TILE returned +74. 9% versus NCL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NCL or TILE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Interface, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning TILE is approximately 76% more volatile than NCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Northann Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NCL or TILE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northann Corp.
(NCL) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 5. 4% for Interface, Inc. (TILE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northann Corp. grew EPS 51. 4% year-over-year, compared to 32. 4% for Interface, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TILE leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NCL or TILE?
Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -28. 5% for Northann Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TILE leads at 11. 8% versus -10. 9% for NCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TILE leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NCL or TILE?
In this comparison, TILE (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NCL or TILE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCL: -99. 6%, TILE: +74. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NCL and TILE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TILE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.