Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NCRA vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
NCRA vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $2M | $947.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $725.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $23.06B |
| Gross Margin | 1.4% | 25.0% |
| Operating Margin | -25.2% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.9x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $10.73B |
NCRA vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nocera, Inc. (NCRA) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCRA vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, NCRA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 52 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 434.3% 10Y total return vs NCRA's -97.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs NCRA's -35.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs NCRA's -34.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs NCRA's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 52-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.3% vs NCRA's -83.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs NCRA's -52.5%, ROIC 14.4% vs -70.0% |
NCRA vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCRA vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 63782.1x NCRA's $11M. WMT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCRA's -34.0%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $725.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $41.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $23.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +25.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.0% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.8% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +19.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NCRA leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $947.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $1.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.84x | 43.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 8.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-132 for NCRA. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCRA's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs NCRA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.0% | +22.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.5% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -70.0% | +14.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.9% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.31x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,307 | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $26,191 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $343 for NCRA. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +22.3% total return vs NCRA's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 34.5% vs NCRA's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.3% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.7% | +22.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +143.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +161.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +434.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | +34.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCRA's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs NCRA's 7.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $135.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $93.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.0% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 18.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 52 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
WMT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NCRA vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCRA or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 43. 5x trailing P/E (40. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NCRA or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +161. 9%, compared to -96. 6% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +434. 3% versus NCRA's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NCRA or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Nocera, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning NCRA is approximately 26530% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 3% for Nocera, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NCRA or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -35. 2% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for Nocera, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NCRA or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -25. 7% for Nocera, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus -22. 3% for NCRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NCRA or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NCRA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NCRA or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 0. 8% yield, +434. 3% 10Y return). Nocera, Inc. (NCRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +434. 3%, NCRA: -97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NCRA and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while NCRA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.