Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NCSM vs PUMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
NCSM vs PUMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $105M | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $180M | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 2021.8x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $91M |
NCSM vs PUMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 385.2 | +285.2% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 318.6 | +218.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCSM vs PUMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.28
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs NCSM's -90.0%
- +199.8% vs NCSM's +34.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 2021.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs PUMP's -1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs PUMP's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.8% vs NCSM's +34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs PUMP's -1.0%, ROIC 7.9% vs 1.4% |
NCSM vs PUMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NCSM vs PUMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCSM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PUMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 6.6x NCSM's $180M. NCSM is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUMP's -1.1%. On growth, NCSM holds the edge at -8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $180M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.7% | -24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -109.3% | -134.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NCSM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 100% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PUMP's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.63x | 2021.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.60x | 10.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.01x | 45.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PUMP's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCSM scores 6/9 vs PUMP's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.21x | -0.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PUMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NCSM five years ago would be worth $15,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,076 for PUMP. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +199.8% total return vs NCSM's +34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PUMP at 33.2% vs NCSM's 27.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | +60.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.8% | +199.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.1% | +136.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +50.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | +8.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCSM and PUMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PUMP's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PUMP currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 45.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.36 | $18.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.64 | $4.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.9% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.6 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
NCSM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PUMP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NCSM vs PUMP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCSM or PUMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCSM or PUMP?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCSM or PUMP?
Over the past 5 years, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) delivered a total return of +58. 9%, compared to +50. 8% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PUMP returned +8. 8% versus NCSM's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCSM or PUMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus ProPetro Holding Corp. 's 1. 12β — meaning PUMP is approximately 305% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 30% for ProPetro Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCSM or PUMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to 100. 6% for ProPetro Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCSM leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCSM or PUMP?
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 0. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NCSM leads at 6. 4% versus 1. 5% for PUMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCSM leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NCSM or PUMP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NCSM or PUMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -90. 0%, PUMP: +8. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NCSM and PUMP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.