Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NCT vs EVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
NCT vs EVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3M | $13.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $3.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $592M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 99.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $1.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.47B |
NCT vs EVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercont (Cayman) … (NCT) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Evercore Inc. (EVR) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCT vs EVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.11, yield 100.0%
- Lower P/E (0.8x vs 17.5x)
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EVR's 1.0%
EVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 54.7%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs NCT's -98.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.90, Low D/E 49.8%, current ratio 5.80x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% NII/revenue growth vs NCT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs NCT's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.90 vs NCT's 2.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EVR's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.9% vs NCT's -96.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs NCT's 4.3%, ROIC 18.8% vs 9.1% |
NCT vs EVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCT vs EVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 152.0x NCT's $26M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.3% (EVR) to 12.3% (NCT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $804M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $592M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +99.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +30.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NCT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.8x trailing earnings, NCT trades at a 96% valuation discount to EVR's 23.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCT's 2.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EVR's 15.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.85x | 23.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.18x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 3.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 6.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.43x | 11.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVR delivers a 29.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $22 for NCT. EVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCT's 2.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVR scores 6/9 vs NCT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.7% | +29.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +14.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +18.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.5% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.41x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | -$311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.16x | 32.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVR five years ago would be worth $23,623 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for NCT. Over the past 12 months, EVR leads with a +60.9% total return vs NCT's -96.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVR at 46.8% vs NCT's -74.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.1% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.7% | +60.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +216.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +136.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +613.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.7% | +46.8% |
Risk & Volatility
EVR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVR is the less volatile stock with a 1.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCT's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVR currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs NCT's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.75 | $388.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $206.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 256K | 622K |
Analyst Outlook
NCT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs EVR's 0.98%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $382.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $11.93 | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
EVR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
NCT vs EVR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCT or EVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Evercore Inc.
(EVR) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evercore Inc. (EVR) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCT or EVR?
On trailing P/E, Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) is the cheapest at 0.
8x versus Evercore Inc. at 23. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCT or EVR?
Over the past 5 years, Evercore Inc.
(EVR) delivered a total return of +136. 2%, compared to -98. 4% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVR returned +613. 3% versus NCT's -98. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCT or EVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Evercore Inc.
(EVR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 90β versus Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares's 2. 11β — meaning NCT is approximately 11% more volatile than EVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Evercore Inc. (EVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 2% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCT or EVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evercore Inc.
(EVR) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus -21. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Evercore Inc. grew EPS 54. 7% year-over-year, compared to -70. 5% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCT or EVR?
Evercore Inc.
(EVR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 3% net margin versus 12. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVR leads at 20. 5% versus 19. 9% for NCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVR leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NCT or EVR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Evercore Inc. (EVR).
08Is NCT or EVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Evercore Inc.
(EVR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +613. 3% 10Y return). Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVR: +613. 3%, NCT: -98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NCT and EVR?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCT (Industrials) and EVR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NCT is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare EVR vs LAZ
LAZ is one of the most direct listed alternatives to EVR.
Compare NCT vs GS
Compare NCT against another closely matched public peer instead of a generic same-sector name.
Expand With GS + MS
GS and MS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.