Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NCT
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CI
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-98.2%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$287.62B
5Y Perf.+71.4%
MS
Morgan Stanley

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$302.59B
5Y Perf.+65.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$825.89B
5Y Perf.+23.2%

NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NCT logoNCT
GS logoGS
MS logoMS
JPM logoJPM
IndustryMarine ShippingFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$3M$287.62B$302.59B$825.89B
Revenue (TTM)$26M$126.85B$103.14B$270.79B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$16.67B$16.18B$58.03B
Gross Margin28.8%41.1%55.6%58.6%
Operating Margin19.9%14.5%17.1%27.7%
Forward P/E0.8x15.8x16.2x13.6x
Total Debt$26M$616.93B$360.49B$751.15B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$182.09B$75.74B$469.32B

NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NCT
GS
MS
JPM
StockMar 25May 26Return
Intercont (Cayman) … (NCT)1001.8-98.2%
The Goldman Sachs G… (GS)100171.4+71.4%
Morgan Stanley (MS)100165.5+65.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100123.2+23.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NCT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NCT
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares
The Value Play

NCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (0.8x vs 16.2x)
  • 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
  • 4.3% ROA vs GS's 0.9%, ROIC 9.1% vs 1.9%
Best for: value and dividends
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 77.3%
  • 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs NCT's -21.3%
  • +70.6% vs NCT's -96.7%
Best for: growth exposure
MS
Morgan Stanley
The Banking Pick

MS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 7.3% 10Y total return vs GS's 5.3%
  • Beta 1.37, yield 2.0%, current ratio 0.66x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 1.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.65x
  • PEG 1.04 vs MS's 1.82
  • NIM 2.3% vs GS's 0.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGS logoGS17.0% NII/revenue growth vs NCT's -21.3%
ValueNCT logoNCTLower P/E (0.8x vs 16.2x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM21.6% margin vs GS's 11.3%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 1.00 vs NCT's 2.11, lower leverage
DividendsNCT logoNCT100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
Momentum (1Y)GS logoGS+70.6% vs NCT's -96.7%
Efficiency (ROA)NCT logoNCT4.3% ROA vs GS's 0.9%, ROIC 9.1% vs 1.9%

NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NCTIntercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares

Segment breakdown not available.

GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Global Markets
65.3%$34.9B
Investment Management
30.2%$16.1B
Platform Solutions
4.5%$2.4B
MSMorgan Stanley
FY 2024
Wealth Management Segment
45.6%$28.4B
Institutional Securities Segment
45.0%$28.1B
Investment Management Segment
9.4%$5.9B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2024
Consumer & Community Banking
40.3%$71.5B
Commercial And Investment Bank
39.5%$70.1B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
12.2%$21.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
9.8%$17.4B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,037,000,000

NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNCTLAGGINGMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 10608.0x NCT's $26M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GS's 11.3%.

MetricNCT logoNCTIntercont (Cayman…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$26M$126.9B$103.1B$270.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$23.4B$26.3B$81.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$16.7B$16.2B$58.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15.8B-$6.7B-$119.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.8%+41.1%+55.6%+58.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.9%+14.5%+17.1%+27.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.3%+11.3%+13.0%+21.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.4%-12.1%-2.0%-15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.8%+48.9%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 0.8x trailing earnings, NCT trades at a 96% valuation discount to MS's 23.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.19x vs MS's 2.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNCT logoNCTIntercont (Cayman…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$3M$287.6B$302.6B$825.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$25M$722.5B$587.3B$1.11T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.85x22.84x23.92x15.51x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.79x16.24x13.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.63x2.69x1.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.18x34.75x25.81x13.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.11x2.27x2.93x3.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.25x2.53x2.91x2.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.43x
NCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NCT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

NCT delivers a 21.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $13 for GS. JPM carries lower financial leverage with a 2.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 5.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCT scores 5/9 vs GS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNCT logoNCTIntercont (Cayman…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+21.7%+12.6%+14.6%+16.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.3%+0.9%+1.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.1%+1.9%+2.9%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.5%+3.6%+3.8%+8.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95455
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.41x5.06x3.42x2.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$23M$434.8B$284.7B$281.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$182.1B$75.7B$469.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$26M$616.9B$360.5B$751.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.16x0.31x0.44x0.74x
NCT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for NCT. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs NCT's -96.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs NCT's -74.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNCT logoNCTIntercont (Cayman…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-48.1%+1.8%+5.7%-5.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.7%+70.6%+63.0%+25.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%+195.2%+138.4%+134.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%+164.4%+136.2%+104.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%+534.3%+732.3%+461.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-74.7%+43.5%+33.6%+32.9%
GS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCT's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MS currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NCT's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNCT logoNCTIntercont (Cayman…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.93x1.47x1.36x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$133.75$984.70$194.83$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.22$547.74$118.20$248.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.1%+94.0%+97.6%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.559.566.059.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded256K2.0M5.4M8.3M
Evenly matched — MS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NCT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GS as "Hold", MS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for JPM (target: $339) vs 5.9% for GS (target: $981). For income investors, NCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs GS's 1.46%.

MetricNCT logoNCTIntercont (Cayman…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$980.78$203.00$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts555261
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+1.5%+2.0%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2121114
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$11.93$13.48$3.81$5.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%+1.4%+3.5%
Evenly matched — NCT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NCT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallIntercont (Cayman) Limited … (NCT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NCT vs GS vs MS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NCT or GS or MS or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Morgan Stanley (MS) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NCT or GS or MS or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) is the cheapest at 0.

8x versus Morgan Stanley at 23. 9x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 13. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 04x versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NCT or GS or MS or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to -98. 4% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +743. 3% versus NCT's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NCT or GS or MS or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares's 1. 93β — meaning NCT is approximately 94% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NCT or GS or MS or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus -21. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 77. 3% year-over-year, compared to -70. 5% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NCT or GS or MS or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 11. 3% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 14. 5% for GS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NCT or GS or MS or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 13. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Morgan Stanley — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 10. 6% to $338. 78.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NCT or GS or MS or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).

09

Is NCT or GS or MS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +454. 6% 10Y return). Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 6%, NCT: -98. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NCT and GS and MS and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (NCT (Industrials) and GS (Financial Services) and MS (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NCT is a small-cap deep-value stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock; MS is a large-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NCT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JPM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NCT and GS and MS and JPM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NCT: -21.3% · GS: 17.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(NCT: 12.3% · GS: 11.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NCT: 0.8x · GS: 22.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.