Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTES

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NCTY
The9 Limited

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.-90.2%
GIGM
GigaMedia Limited

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • TW
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-48.7%
SOHU
Sohu.com Limited

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$475M
5Y Perf.+135.8%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$74.15B
5Y Perf.+52.9%

NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTES — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NCTY logoNCTY
GIGM logoGIGM
SOHU logoSOHU
NTES logoNTES
IndustryElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$26M$16M$475M$74.15B
Revenue (TTM)$289M$3M$577M$112.25B
Net Income (TTM)$-228M$-1M$149M$33.67B
Gross Margin-14.1%52.8%76.9%64.3%
Operating Margin-140.6%-100.6%-9.2%31.8%
Forward P/E1.9x
Total Debt$235M$500K$38M$6.39B
Cash & Equiv.$59M$35M$160M$51.52B

NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTESLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NCTY
GIGM
SOHU
NTES
StockMay 20May 26Return
The9 Limited (NCTY)1009.8-90.2%
GigaMedia Limited (GIGM)10051.3-48.7%
Sohu.com Limited (SOHU)100235.8+135.8%
NetEase, Inc. (NTES)100152.9+52.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTES

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTES leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. GigaMedia Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. SOHU also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NCTY
The9 Limited
The Secondary Option

NCTY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
GIGM
GigaMedia Limited
The Defensive Pick

GIGM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 18.35x
  • Beta 0.27, current ratio 18.35x
  • Beta 0.27 vs NCTY's 2.56, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SOHU
Sohu.com Limited
The Momentum Pick

SOHU is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +50.0% vs NCTY's -46.7%
Best for: momentum
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.6%
  • Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 11.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
  • 375.8% 10Y total return vs GIGM's -44.6%
  • 4.0% revenue growth vs GIGM's -30.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTES logoNTES4.0% revenue growth vs GIGM's -30.8%
Quality / MarginsNTES logoNTES30.0% margin vs NCTY's -78.9%
Stability / SafetyGIGM logoGIGMBeta 0.27 vs NCTY's 2.56, lower leverage
DividendsNTES logoNTES2.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SOHU logoSOHU+50.0% vs NCTY's -46.7%
Efficiency (ROA)NTES logoNTES15.2% ROA vs NCTY's -45.2%, ROIC 23.3% vs -37.2%

NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NCTYThe9 Limited
FY 2025
Cryptocurrency Mining Revenue
100.0%$56M
GIGMGigaMedia Limited
FY 2024
Mah Jong And Casino Casual Games
73.5%$1M
Rpgs
23.6%$338,000
Others
2.9%$41,000
SOHUSohu.com Limited
FY 2024
Entertainment
84.0%$502M
Advertising
12.3%$73M
Product and Service, Other
3.8%$23M
NTESNetEase, Inc.
FY 2024
Innovative businesses and others
59.0%$8.1B
Youdao
41.0%$5.6B

NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTES — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNTESLAGGINGSOHU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NTES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NTES is the larger business by revenue, generating $112.2B annually — 33032.8x GIGM's $3M. NTES is the more profitable business, keeping 30.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCTY's -78.9%. On growth, GIGM holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGIGM logoGIGMGigaMedia LimitedSOHU logoSOHUSohu.com LimitedNTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$289M$3M$577M$112.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$407M-$3M-$22M$38.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$228M-$1M$149M$33.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$62M$0$0$48.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-14.1%+52.8%+76.9%+64.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-140.6%-100.6%-9.2%+31.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-78.9%-37.3%+25.9%+30.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-21.5%-80.3%-11.4%+43.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-74.3%+19.1%+18.7%+1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-183.2%-2.0%+161.5%-30.4%
NTES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GIGM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricNCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGIGM logoGIGMGigaMedia LimitedSOHU logoSOHUSohu.com LimitedNTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$26M$16M$475M$74.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$52M-$18M$353M$67.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.76x-6.81x-5.05x15.63x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.40x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.72x5.32x0.79x4.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.20x0.39x0.55x3.10x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.44x
GIGM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

NTES delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-121 for NCTY. GIGM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCTY's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTES scores 8/9 vs NCTY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGIGM logoGIGMGigaMedia LimitedSOHU logoSOHUSohu.com LimitedNTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-120.6%-3.3%+14.1%+20.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.2%-3.1%+8.8%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-37.2%-45.9%-10.7%+23.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-70.7%-8.8%-7.4%+22.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92448
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.97x0.01x0.04x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$176M-$35M-$122M-$45.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$59M$35M$160M$51.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$235M$500,000$38M$6.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.65x
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTES five years ago would be worth $11,631 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $321 for NCTY. Over the past 12 months, SOHU leads with a +50.0% total return vs NCTY's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTES at 11.2% vs NCTY's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGIGM logoGIGMGigaMedia LimitedSOHU logoSOHUSohu.com LimitedNTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.1%-7.1%-0.2%-19.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-46.7%-7.1%+50.0%+12.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.0%-3.4%+14.6%+37.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.8%-49.8%-11.9%+16.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-44.6%-61.9%+375.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.6%-1.1%+4.6%+11.2%
NTES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GIGM and SOHU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GIGM is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCTY's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOHU currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs NCTY's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGIGM logoGIGMGigaMedia LimitedSOHU logoSOHUSohu.com LimitedNTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.56x0.27x0.71x0.74x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.51$1.89$17.30$159.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.00$1.31$9.50$103.23
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.2%+75.7%+91.3%+73.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.936.753.558.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded31K5K47K750K
Evenly matched — GIGM and SOHU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NTES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NCTY as "Sell", SOHU as "Hold", NTES as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.9% upside for NTES (target: $150) vs 26.6% for SOHU (target: $20). NTES is the only dividend payer here at 2.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGIGM logoGIGMGigaMedia LimitedSOHU logoSOHUSohu.com LimitedNTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellSellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.00$149.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts31832
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1014
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$20.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+8.6%+0.1%
NTES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NTES leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GIGM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallNetEase, Inc. (NTES)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NCTY vs GIGM vs SOHU vs NTES: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) is the stronger pick with 4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 8% for GigaMedia Limited (GIGM). NetEase, Inc. (NTES) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NetEase, Inc. (NTES) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES?

Over the past 5 years, NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to -96. 8% for The9 Limited (NCTY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTES returned +375. 8% versus NCTY's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GigaMedia Limited (GIGM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus The9 Limited's 2. 56β — meaning NCTY is approximately 851% more volatile than GIGM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GigaMedia Limited (GIGM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 97% for The9 Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) is pulling ahead at 4. 0% versus -30. 8% for GigaMedia Limited (GIGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GigaMedia Limited grew EPS 32. 3% year-over-year, compared to -251. 7% for Sohu. com Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTES leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES?

NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus -373. 0% for The9 Limited — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTES leads at 31. 8% versus -229. 6% for NCTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOHU leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTES: 27.

9% to $149. 75.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES?

In this comparison, NTES (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. NCTY, GIGM, SOHU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NCTY or GIGM or SOHU or NTES better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 6% yield, +375. 8% 10Y return). The9 Limited (NCTY) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTES: +375. 8%, NCTY: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NCTY and GIGM and SOHU and NTES?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GIGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTES is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NTES pays a dividend while NCTY, GIGM, SOHU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NCTY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GIGM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOHU

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTES

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NCTY and GIGM and SOHU and NTES on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NCTY: -74.3% · GIGM: 19.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.