Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NDSN vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
NDSN vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $15.98B | $601.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.85B | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $523M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.9% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.09B | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108M | $24.81B |
NDSN vs SPIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordson Corporation (NDSN) | 100 | 140.8 | +40.8% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NDSN vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NDSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
- 302.8% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.9%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 25.1x)
- +93.2% vs NDSN's +54.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 25.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.2% vs NDSN's +54.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 10.5% vs -0.1% |
NDSN vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NDSN vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NDSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NDSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 39.8x SPIR's $72M. NDSN is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, NDSN holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $851M | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $523M | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $646M | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.2% | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SPIR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 66% valuation discount to NDSN's 33.7x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.0B | $601.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.0B | $585.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.72x | 11.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.10x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.73x | 8406.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.37x | 5.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NDSN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NDSN delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDSN's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDSN scores 6/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.2% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.5% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108M | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.44x | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NDSN five years ago would be worth $14,396 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +93.2% total return vs NDSN's +54.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs NDSN's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | +134.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.0% | +93.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +238.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.0% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +302.8% | -75.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NDSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NDSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NDSN currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $305.28 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $187.89 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NDSN as "Buy" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for NDSN (target: $312) vs -5.7% for SPIR (target: $17). NDSN is the only dividend payer here at 1.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $311.50 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 37 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% |
NDSN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPIR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
NDSN vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NDSN or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nordson Corporation (NDSN) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NDSN or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Nordson Corporation at 33. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NDSN or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) delivered a total return of +44.
0%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDSN returned +302. 8% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NDSN or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 179% more volatile than NDSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 69% for Nordson Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NDSN or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 9% for Nordson Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NDSN leads at 2. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NDSN or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 17. 4% for Nordson Corporation — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NDSN leads at 25. 5% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NDSN leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NDSN or SPIR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDSN: 8.
6% to $311. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NDSN or SPIR?
In this comparison, NDSN (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NDSN or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05), 1. 1% yield, +302. 8% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NDSN: +302. 8%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NDSN and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NDSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. NDSN pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.