Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NE vs RIG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NE
Noble Corporation Plc

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.00B
5Y Perf.+102.7%
RIG
Transocean Ltd.

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNYSE • CH
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.+41.6%

NE vs RIG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NE logoNE
RIG logoRIG
IndustryOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$8.00B$5.78B
Revenue (TTM)$3.20B$4.14B
Net Income (TTM)$229M$-2.77B
Gross Margin22.4%70.2%
Operating Margin16.8%22.4%
Forward P/E46.6x33.8x
Total Debt$1.98B$5.66B
Cash & Equiv.$471M$997M

NE vs RIGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NE
RIG
StockJun 21May 26Return
Noble Corporation P… (NE)100202.7+102.7%
Transocean Ltd. (RIG)100141.6+41.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NE vs RIG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Transocean Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NE
Noble Corporation Plc
The Income Pick

NE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 7.4%, EPS growth -54.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.5%
  • 124.8% 10Y total return vs RIG's -35.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RIG
Transocean Ltd.
The Growth Leader

RIG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and value.

  • 12.5% revenue growth vs NE's 7.4%
  • Lower P/E (33.8x vs 46.6x)
  • +156.0% vs NE's +124.5%
Best for: growth and value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRIG logoRIG12.5% revenue growth vs NE's 7.4%
ValueRIG logoRIGLower P/E (33.8x vs 46.6x)
Quality / MarginsNE logoNE7.2% margin vs RIG's -66.8%
Stability / SafetyNE logoNEBeta 0.91 vs RIG's 1.13, lower leverage
DividendsNE logoNE4.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RIG logoRIG+156.0% vs NE's +124.5%
Efficiency (ROA)NE logoNE3.0% ROA vs RIG's -17.1%, ROIC 6.2% vs 3.6%

NE vs RIG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NENoble Corporation Plc
FY 2025
Oil and Gas Service
50.0%$3.1B
Floaters
41.3%$2.6B
Jackups
8.7%$540M
RIGTransocean Ltd.
FY 2019
Oil And Gas Service
100.0%$3.1B

NE vs RIG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNELAGGINGRIG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RIG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

RIG and NE operate at a comparable scale, with $4.1B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. NE is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RIG's -66.8%. On growth, RIG holds the edge at +19.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNE logoNENoble Corporation…RIG logoRIGTransocean Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.1B$1.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$229M-$2.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$444M$796M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.4%+70.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.8%+22.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.2%-66.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.9%+19.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-10.2%+19.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%+157.5%
RIG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RIG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, RIG's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NE's 8.6x.

MetricNE logoNENoble Corporation…RIG logoRIGTransocean Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$8.0B$5.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.5B$10.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS37.14x-2.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.46.59x33.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.63x7.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.43x1.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.77x0.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.50x9.23x
RIG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

NE delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-33 for RIG. NE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RIG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RIG scores 6/9 vs NE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNE logoNENoble Corporation…RIG logoRIGTransocean Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.0%-32.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.0%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.2%+3.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.5%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.5B$4.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$471M$997M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.0B$5.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.26x-3.06x
NE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NE five years ago would be worth $22,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,842 for RIG. Over the past 12 months, RIG leads with a +156.0% total return vs NE's +124.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NE at 14.5% vs RIG's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNE logoNENoble Corporation…RIG logoRIGTransocean Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.6%+50.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+124.5%+156.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.2%+6.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+124.8%+68.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+124.8%-35.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.5%+2.1%
NE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NE is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIG's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricNE logoNENoble Corporation…RIG logoRIGTransocean Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x1.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$54.57$7.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.37$2.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.9%+89.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.543.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M33.6M
NE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates NE as "Hold" and RIG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.6% upside for RIG (target: $7) vs -8.7% for NE (target: $46). NE is the only dividend payer here at 3.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNE logoNENoble Corporation…RIG logoRIGTransocean Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$45.80$6.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts5164
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%
NE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RIG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallNoble Corporation Plc (NE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NE vs RIG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NE or RIG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Transocean Ltd.

(RIG) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 4% for Noble Corporation Plc (NE). Noble Corporation Plc (NE) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (46. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Noble Corporation Plc (NE) a "Hold" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NE or RIG?

On forward P/E, Transocean Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 33. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NE or RIG?

Over the past 5 years, Noble Corporation Plc (NE) delivered a total return of +124.

8%, compared to +68. 4% for Transocean Ltd. (RIG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NE returned +124. 8% versus RIG's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NE or RIG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Noble Corporation Plc (NE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

91β versus Transocean Ltd. 's 1. 13β — meaning RIG is approximately 24% more volatile than NE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Noble Corporation Plc (NE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 70% for Transocean Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NE or RIG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transocean Ltd.

(RIG) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 7. 4% for Noble Corporation Plc (NE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Noble Corporation Plc grew EPS -54. 4% year-over-year, compared to -406. 7% for Transocean Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NE leads at 32. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NE or RIG?

Noble Corporation Plc (NE) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

6% net margin versus -73. 5% for Transocean Ltd. — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RIG leads at 17. 8% versus 15. 7% for NE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RIG leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NE or RIG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Transocean Ltd.

(RIG) trades at 33. 8x forward P/E versus 46. 6x for Noble Corporation Plc — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RIG: 3. 6% to $6. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NE or RIG?

In this comparison, NE (4.

0% yield) pays a dividend. RIG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NE or RIG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Noble Corporation Plc (NE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

91), 4. 0% yield, +124. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NE: +124. 8%, RIG: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NE and RIG?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RIG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NE pays a dividend while RIG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NE and RIG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NE: -10.2% · RIG: 19.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.