Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NEGG vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
NEGG vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $612M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $40M |
NEGG vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newegg Commerce, In… (NEGG) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEGG vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.0% vs FLXS's +80.1%
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs NEGG's -89.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs NEGG's -17.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs NEGG's -1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs NEGG's 3.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs FLXS's +80.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs NEGG's -5.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs -39.3% |
NEGG vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEGG vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEGG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.9x FLXS's $458M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEGG's -1.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.8% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NEGG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $612M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $586M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.98x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.31x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-20 for NEGG. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEGG's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs NEGG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.5% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.2% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -45.86x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,360 for NEGG. Over the past 12 months, NEGG leads with a +695.9% total return vs FLXS's +80.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs NEGG's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.1% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +695.9% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.8% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FLXS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLXS is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEGG's 3.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs NEGG's 21.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.14x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.84 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.50 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.2% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply -2.1% upside for FLXS (target: $54) vs -73.5% for NEGG (target: $8). FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NEGG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NEGG vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEGG or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NEGG or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -86. 4% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus NEGG's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NEGG or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Newegg Commerce, Inc. 's 3. 14β — meaning NEGG is approximately 107% more volatile than FLXS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 69% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NEGG or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to 27. 9% for Newegg Commerce, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLXS leads at -6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NEGG or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -3. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus -4. 2% for NEGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLXS leads at 22. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NEGG or FLXS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLXS: -2.
1% to $54. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NEGG or FLXS?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. NEGG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NEGG or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) carries a higher beta of 3. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLXS: +51. 4%, NEGG: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NEGG and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS pays a dividend while NEGG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.