Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Specialty Retail
NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $535M | $299M | $49.20B | $560M | $2.93T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $458M | $11.60B | $615M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $22M | $2.04B | $47M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 23.2% | 72.0% | 60.5% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 6.1% | 19.6% | 10.1% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x | 17.6x | 8.6x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $59M | $7.38B | $124M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $40M | $1.87B | $76M | $86.81B |
NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newegg Commerce, In… (NEGG) | 100 | 142.2 | +42.2% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 147.1 | +47.1% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 193.6 | +93.6% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEGG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.2% vs ETH's +10.2%
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.78x
- Beta 1.45, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.78x
- 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
EBAY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- 17.6% margin vs NEGG's -1.7%
- Beta 0.73 vs NEGG's 3.16
ETH is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs AMZN's 1.12
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.12
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 374.6%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs NEGG's -17.5%
- 11.5% ROA vs NEGG's -5.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs -39.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs NEGG's -17.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs NEGG's -1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs NEGG's 3.16 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs ETH's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs NEGG's -5.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs -39.3% |
NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
ETH leads 1 • FLXS leads 1 • NEGG leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1621.4x FLXS's $458M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEGG's -1.7%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $458M | $11.6B | $615M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $31M | $2.6B | $70M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $22M | $2.0B | $47M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $28M | $1.7B | $20M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +23.2% | +72.0% | +60.5% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +6.1% | +19.6% | +10.1% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +4.8% | +17.6% | +8.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +6.1% | +14.5% | +0.0% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +9.8% | +19.5% | — | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.8% | -27.2% | +5.7% | -28.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 71% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.26x vs AMZN's 1.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $535M | $299M | $49.2B | $560M | $2.93T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $508M | $318M | $54.7B | $607M | $3.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.34x | 15.73x | 24.80x | 10.94x | 38.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 17.62x | 8.62x | 31.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.26x | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.50x | 21.25x | 9.79x | 20.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.68x | 4.43x | 0.91x | 4.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 1.89x | 10.73x | 1.17x | 7.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.85x | 29.62x | 9999.00x | 381.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-20 for NEGG. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ETH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.5% | +12.2% | +44.1% | +10.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | +7.5% | +11.5% | +6.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +9.9% | +16.8% | +7.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.2% | +12.3% | +17.4% | +10.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.35x | 1.60x | 0.26x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | $19M | $5.5B | $47M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $40M | $1.9B | $76M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $59M | $7.4B | $124M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -45.86x | 380.21x | 10.52x | 721.00x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,331 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,231 for NEGG. Over the past 12 months, NEGG leads with a +520.7% total return vs ETH's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.3% vs ETH's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.2% | +40.4% | +24.0% | -25.4% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +520.7% | +77.1% | +54.2% | +10.2% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.0% | +246.5% | +140.1% | -32.8% | +157.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +29.5% | +83.3% | -29.7% | +70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | +53.0% | +374.6% | -18.2% | +702.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.1% | +51.3% | +33.9% | -12.4% | +37.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBAY and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEGG's 3.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs NEGG's 18.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.16x | 1.45x | 0.73x | 2.83x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.84 | $59.95 | $111.38 | $45.78 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.56 | $29.38 | $67.87 | $17.07 | $188.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.5% | +93.1% | +96.7% | +48.0% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.1 | 60.7 | 59.4 | 51.4 | 74.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 69K | 47K | 5.3M | 4.5M | 45.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FLXS and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NEGG as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", ETH as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs -69.6% for NEGG (target: $8). For income investors, FLXS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.12% vs EBAY's 1.07%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | $54.00 | $109.87 | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 68 | 10 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +1.1% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 7 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $1.15 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.9% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EBAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ETH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NEGG vs FLXS vs EBAY vs ETH vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +83. 3%, compared to -87. 7% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus NEGG's -90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Newegg Commerce, Inc. 's 3. 16β — meaning NEGG is approximately 332% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -3. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -4. 2% for NEGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 22. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 12. 5% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NEGG, ETH, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEGG or FLXS or EBAY or ETH or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) carries a higher beta of 3. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +374. 6%, NEGG: -90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEGG and FLXS and EBAY and ETH and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEGG (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. FLXS, EBAY pay a dividend while NEGG, ETH, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.