Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NEGG vs PRTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
NEGG vs PRTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $612M | $59M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $548M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 32.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | -8.9% |
| Total Debt | $73M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $26M |
NEGG vs PRTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newegg Commerce, In… (NEGG) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEGG vs PRTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEGG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -1.7% margin vs PRTS's -9.2%
- +7.0% vs PRTS's +3.4%
- -5.8% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5%, ROIC -39.3% vs -51.3%
PRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.28
- Rev growth -7.0%, EPS growth -15.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.1%
- -73.7% 10Y total return vs NEGG's -89.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.0% revenue growth vs NEGG's -17.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.7% margin vs PRTS's -9.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs NEGG's 3.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs PRTS's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.8% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5%, ROIC -39.3% vs -51.3% |
NEGG vs PRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEGG vs PRTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEGG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEGG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.4x PRTS's $548M. NEGG is the more profitable business, keeping -1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTS's -9.2%. On growth, NEGG holds the edge at +12.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $548M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +32.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.8% | +55.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $612M | $59M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $586M | $59M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.98x | -1.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.31x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEGG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEGG delivers a -20.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-20 in annual profit, vs $-80 for PRTS. PRTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEGG's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEGG scores 5/9 vs PRTS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.5% | -79.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | -25.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | -51.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.2% | -43.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | -$660,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -45.86x | -49.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEGG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEGG five years ago would be worth $1,360 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $564 for PRTS. Over the past 12 months, NEGG leads with a +695.9% total return vs PRTS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEGG at 9.9% vs PRTS's -43.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.1% | +69.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +695.9% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.8% | -81.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -73.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | -43.1% |
Risk & Volatility
PRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEGG's 3.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRTS currently trades 62.3% from its 52-week high vs NEGG's 21.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.14x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.84 | $1.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.50 | $0.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.2% | +62.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% |
NEGG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
NEGG vs PRTS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEGG or PRTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CarParts.
com, Inc. (PRTS) is the stronger pick with -7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Analysts rate Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NEGG or PRTS?
Over the past 5 years, Newegg Commerce, Inc.
(NEGG) delivered a total return of -86. 4%, compared to -94. 4% for CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRTS returned -73. 7% versus NEGG's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NEGG or PRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CarParts.
com, Inc. (PRTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus Newegg Commerce, Inc. 's 3. 14β — meaning NEGG is approximately 146% more volatile than PRTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 69% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NEGG or PRTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CarParts.
com, Inc. (PRTS) is pulling ahead at -7. 0% versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newegg Commerce, Inc. grew EPS 27. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for CarParts. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRTS leads at -6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NEGG or PRTS?
Newegg Commerce, Inc.
(NEGG) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 5% net margin versus -9. 2% for CarParts. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEGG leads at -4. 2% versus -8. 9% for PRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRTS leads at 32. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NEGG or PRTS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NEGG or PRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CarParts.
com, Inc. (PRTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28)). Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) carries a higher beta of 3. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRTS: -73. 7%, NEGG: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NEGG and PRTS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.