Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NET
Cloudflare, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$90.83B
5Y Perf.+784.2%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$138.16B
5Y Perf.+401.2%
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$79.89B
5Y Perf.+287.8%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$128.13B
5Y Perf.+475.9%

NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NET logoNET
PANW logoPANW
FTNT logoFTNT
CRWD logoCRWD
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$90.83B$138.16B$79.89B$128.13B
Revenue (TTM)$2.33B$9.89B$7.11B$4.81B
Net Income (TTM)$-87M$1.28B$1.95B$-183M
Gross Margin73.5%73.5%80.7%74.9%
Operating Margin-9.1%14.4%31.1%-5.4%
Forward P/E228.9x53.3x36.3x103.9x
Total Debt$3.70B$338M$996M$820M
Cash & Equiv.$944M$2.27B$2.50B$5.23B

NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NET
PANW
FTNT
CRWD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cloudflare, Inc. (NET)100884.2+784.2%
Palo Alto Networks,… (PANW)100501.2+401.2%
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT)100387.8+287.8%
CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD)100575.9+475.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FTNT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cloudflare, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NET
Cloudflare, Inc.
The Growth Play

NET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
  • 13.3% 10Y total return vs FTNT's 15.8%
  • 29.8% revenue growth vs FTNT's 14.2%
  • +111.2% vs FTNT's +1.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

PANW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
The Income Pick

FTNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.02
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 80.5%, current ratio 1.17x
  • Beta 1.02, current ratio 1.17x
  • Lower P/E (36.3x vs 103.9x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Angle

CRWD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNET logoNET29.8% revenue growth vs FTNT's 14.2%
ValueFTNT logoFTNTLower P/E (36.3x vs 103.9x)
Quality / MarginsFTNT logoFTNT27.5% margin vs CRWD's -3.8%
Stability / SafetyFTNT logoFTNTBeta 1.02 vs NET's 1.53, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NET logoNET+111.2% vs FTNT's +1.2%
Efficiency (ROA)FTNT logoFTNT19.4% ROA vs CRWD's -1.9%

NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NETCloudflare, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$2.2B
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription
53.9%$5.0B
Support
26.5%$2.4B
Product
19.5%$1.8B
FTNTFortinet, Inc.
FY 2025
Security Subscription
38.7%$2.6B
Product
32.6%$2.2B
Technical Support and Other
28.6%$1.9B
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
FY 2026
Subscription and Circulation
94.9%$4.6B
Professional Services
5.1%$247M

NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFTNTLAGGINGCRWD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FTNT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PANW is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 4.2x NET's $2.3B. FTNT is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRWD's -3.8%. On growth, NET holds the edge at +33.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.3B$9.9B$7.1B$4.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$67M$1.9B$2.3B$22M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$87M$1.3B$2.0B-$183M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$365M$4.1B$2.4B$1.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.5%+73.5%+80.7%+74.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.1%+14.4%+31.1%-5.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.7%+13.0%+27.5%-3.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.7%+41.1%+34.3%+25.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.5%+14.9%+20.1%+23.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+57.9%+28.6%+140.5%
FTNT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FTNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 44.4x trailing earnings, FTNT trades at a 64% valuation discount to PANW's 122.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FTNT's 35.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NET's 1062.7x.

MetricNET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…
Market CapShares × price$90.8B$138.2B$79.9B$128.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93.6B$136.2B$78.4B$123.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-886.38x122.83x44.43x-778.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.228.90x53.30x36.28x103.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1062.71x85.88x35.09x1031.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue41.90x14.98x11.75x26.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share61.38x17.82x65.26x29.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF280.08x39.82x35.89x97.79x
FTNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PANW and FTNT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FTNT delivers a 155.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $156 in annual profit, vs $-6 for NET. PANW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NET's 2.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTNT scores 7/9 vs NET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.2%+13.6%+155.7%-4.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.5%+5.1%+19.4%-1.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.6%+17.1%-193.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.6%+8.9%+37.7%-2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93474
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.54x0.04x0.81x0.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.8B-$1.9B-$1.5B-$4.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$944M$2.3B$2.5B$5.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.7B$338M$996M$820M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.22x1559.00x214.35x-6.06x
Evenly matched — PANW and FTNT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NET five years ago would be worth $35,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,495 for FTNT. Over the past 12 months, NET leads with a +111.2% total return vs FTNT's +1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NET at 77.1% vs FTNT's 17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+31.1%+9.6%+38.6%+11.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+111.2%+4.5%+1.2%+19.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+455.1%+105.2%+63.4%+281.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+258.9%+244.4%+154.9%+167.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1328.1%+746.7%+1584.4%+772.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+77.1%+27.1%+17.8%+56.3%
NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NET and FTNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FTNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NET's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NET currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs PANW's 87.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.53x1.02x1.02x1.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$260.00$223.61$112.39$566.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$120.55$139.57$70.12$342.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+87.9%+96.1%+89.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.161.664.361.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.7M7.5M5.8M3.6M
Evenly matched — NET and FTNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NET as "Buy", PANW as "Buy", FTNT as "Hold", CRWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.8% upside for PANW (target: $208) vs -19.6% for FTNT (target: $87).

MetricNET logoNETCloudflare, Inc.PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$216.43$207.85$86.81$528.24
# AnalystsCovering analysts40866865
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.9%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FTNT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NET leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFortinet, Inc. (FTNT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NET vs PANW vs FTNT vs CRWD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 2% for Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) offers the better valuation at 44. 4x trailing P/E (36. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD?

On trailing P/E, Fortinet, Inc.

(FTNT) is the cheapest at 44. 4x versus Palo Alto Networks, Inc. at 122. 8x. On forward P/E, Fortinet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 36. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD?

Over the past 5 years, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) delivered a total return of +258. 9%, compared to +154. 9% for Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTNT returned +1584% versus PANW's +746. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortinet, Inc.

(FTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Cloudflare, Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning NET is approximately 51% more volatile than FTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Cloudflare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus 14. 2% for Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fortinet, Inc. grew EPS 7. 5% year-over-year, compared to -725. 9% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NET leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD?

Fortinet, Inc.

(FTNT) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 3% net margin versus -4. 7% for Cloudflare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTNT leads at 30. 6% versus -9. 4% for NET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTNT leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Fortinet, Inc.

(FTNT) trades at 36. 3x forward P/E versus 228. 9x for Cloudflare, Inc. — 192. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PANW: 5. 8% to $207. 85.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NET or PANW or FTNT or CRWD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortinet, Inc.

(FTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +1584% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTNT: +1584%, CRWD: +772. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NET and PANW and FTNT and CRWD?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PANW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FTNT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRWD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PANW

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FTNT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRWD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NET and PANW and FTNT and CRWD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NET: 33.5% · PANW: 14.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.