NEWP vs AG

First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) offers the better valuation at 60. 5x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) delivered a total return of +33. 6%, compared to +19. 4% for New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEWP returned +20. 9% versus AG's +105. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Pacific Metals Corp.

(NEWP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 1. 56β — meaning AG is approximately 23% more volatile than NEWP relative to the S&P 500.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp.

grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to 36. 9% for New Pacific Metals Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 0. 0% for New Pacific Metals Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AG leads at 27. 8% versus 0. 0% for NEWP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AG leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AG: 25.

1% to $26. 50.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, New Pacific Metals Corp.

(NEWP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEWP: +20. 9%, AG: +105. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NEWP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.