NGS vs PUMP

For growth investors, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) is the cheapest at 25. 2x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) delivered a total return of +324. 0%, compared to +41. 6% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NGS returned +81. 5% versus PUMP's +7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus ProPetro Holding Corp. 's 1. 12β — meaning PUMP is approximately 23% more volatile than NGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 84% for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to 14. 6% for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NGS leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus 0. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NGS leads at 21. 6% versus 1. 5% for PUMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NGS leads at 58. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NGS: 6.

1% to $42. 00.

In this comparison, NGS (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. PUMP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.

(NGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), 0. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NGS: +81. 5%, PUMP: +7. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

NGS pays a dividend while PUMP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.