Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NGS vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
NGS vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $497M | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $172M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $230M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $98M |
NGS vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas Service… (NGS) | 100 | 439.8 | +339.8% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NGS vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 0.5%
- 81.5% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 83.7%, current ratio 2.33x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs SOC's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.2% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -44.6% |
NGS vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NGS vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NGS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $172M annually — 135.6x SOC's $1M. NGS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $172M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$63M | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.1% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SOC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $497M | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $727M | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.21x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.76x | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.41x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.67x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NGS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGS delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGS scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $230M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $230M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.01x | -2.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGS five years ago would be worth $42,402 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, NGS leads with a +107.2% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGS at 57.0% vs SOC's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +107.2% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.0% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.5% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.0% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGS currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.55 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.07 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 97K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NGS as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 6.1% for NGS (target: $42). NGS is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NGS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NGS vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NGS or SOC a better buy right now?
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
(NGS) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NGS or SOC?
On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NGS or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
(NGS) delivered a total return of +324. 0%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NGS returned +81. 5% versus SOC's +32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NGS or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
(NGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 66% more volatile than NGS relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — NGS or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to 14. 6% for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NGS or SOC?
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
(NGS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NGS leads at 21. 6% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NGS leads at 58. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NGS or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NGS or SOC?
In this comparison, NGS (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NGS or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
(NGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), 0. 5% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NGS: +81. 5%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NGS and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NGS pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.