Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NGVC vs HAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
NGVC vs HAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $624M | $85M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $1.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $-544M |
| Gross Margin | 29.8% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | -31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $332M | $779M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $54M |
NGVC vs HAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Grocers by … (NGVC) | 100 | 188.3 | +88.3% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NGVC vs HAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NGVC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 143.1% 10Y total return vs HAIN's -98.4%
In this particular matchup, HAIN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -43.6% vs HAIN's -73.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 8.9% vs -23.7% |
NGVC vs HAIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NGVC vs HAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NGVC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAIN and NGVC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $1.3B in trailing revenue. NGVC is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, NGVC holds the edge at +1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | -$430M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | -$544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $93M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +20.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -36.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | -11.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $624M | $85M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $939M | $810M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.55x | -0.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.87x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.77x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 0.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NGVC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGVC delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. NGVC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAIN's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGVC scores 8/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.1% | -164.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | -36.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | -23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | -29.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 1.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $315M | $725M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $332M | $779M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.18x | -8.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGVC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGVC five years ago would be worth $18,953 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $183 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, NGVC leads with a -43.6% total return vs HAIN's -73.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGVC at 39.0% vs HAIN's -65.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | -28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.6% | -73.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | -95.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.5% | -98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.1% | -98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | -65.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NGVC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NGVC is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGVC currently trades 44.3% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 25.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.22 | $2.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.47 | $0.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.3% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 122K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NGVC as "Buy" and HAIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 56.5% upside for HAIN (target: $1) vs 47.5% for NGVC (target: $40). NGVC is the only dividend payer here at 1.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $1.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.7% |
NGVC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NGVC vs HAIN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NGVC or HAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NGVC or HAIN?
Over the past 5 years, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) delivered a total return of +89. 5%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NGVC returned +143. 1% versus HAIN's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NGVC or HAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 3668% more volatile than NGVC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 156% versus 164% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NGVC or HAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NGVC leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NGVC or HAIN?
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NGVC leads at 4. 7% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NGVC leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NGVC or HAIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAIN: 56.
5% to $1. 17.
07Which pays a better dividend — NGVC or HAIN?
In this comparison, NGVC (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. HAIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NGVC or HAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 1. 7% yield, +143. 1% 10Y return). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NGVC: +143. 1%, HAIN: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NGVC and HAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NGVC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NGVC pays a dividend while HAIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.