Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NGVT logo
NGVT
ASIX logo
ASIX
JPM logo
JPM
TROX logo
TROX
HWKN logo
HWKN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NGVT
Ingevity Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.54B
5Y Perf.+36.9%
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$615M
5Y Perf.+94.3%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.28B
5Y Perf.+11.2%
HWKN
Hawkins, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.30B
5Y Perf.+643.7%

NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NGVT logoNGVT
ASIX logoASIX
JPM logoJPM
TROX logoTROX
HWKN logoHWKN
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicalsBanks - DiversifiedChemicalsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$2.54B$615M$896.00B$1.28B$3.30B
Revenue (TTM)$1.21B$1.55B$280.33B$2.92B$1.08B
Net Income (TTM)$-128M$10M$57.05B$-359M$82M
Gross Margin39.3%7.4%60.0%5.8%22.6%
Operating Margin22.8%0.7%25.9%-4.8%10.6%
Forward P/E14.6x15.9x14.4x40.2x
Total Debt$1.24B$383M$942.38B$3.59B$261M
Cash & Equiv.$78M$20M$343.34B$211M$4M

NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NGVT
ASIX
JPM
TROX
HWKN
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Ingevity Corporation (NGVT)100136.9+36.9%
AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX)100194.3+94.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX)100111.2+11.2%
Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN)100743.7+643.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Hawkins, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NGVT and ASIX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NGVT
Ingevity Corporation
The Momentum Pick

NGVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +66.6% vs ASIX's -4.2%
Best for: momentum
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.
The Income Pick

ASIX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 46.9%, current ratio 1.13x
  • Beta 0.59, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.13x
  • Beta 0.59 vs TROX's 2.33, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.81 vs ASIX's 8.46
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 40.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.65
  • 20.4% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
  • 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs TROX's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: valuation efficiency
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, TROX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
HWKN
Hawkins, Inc.
The Growth Play

HWKN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • 11.2% revenue growth vs NGVT's -17.0%
  • 8.3% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -0.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHWKN logoHWKN11.2% revenue growth vs NGVT's -17.0%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 40.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.65
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
Stability / SafetyASIX logoASIXBeta 0.59 vs TROX's 2.33, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs TROX's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NGVT logoNGVT+66.6% vs ASIX's -4.2%
Efficiency (ROA)HWKN logoHWKN8.3% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -0.3%

NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NGVTIngevity Corporation
FY 2025
Performance Materials
60.2%$607M
Performance Chemicals
39.8%$401M
ASIXAdvanSix Inc.
FY 2025
Chemical Intermediates
39.4%$377M
Nylon Resins
32.3%$310M
Caprolactam
28.3%$271M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
TROXTronox Holdings plc
FY 2025
TiO2
79.3%$2.3B
Product and Service, Other
11.2%$326M
Zircon
9.5%$274M
HWKNHawkins, Inc.
FY 2026
Nutrition
32.3%$138M
Food
23.2%$99M
Bulk
22.5%$96M
Agricultural
12.3%$53M
Pharmaceutical
6.5%$28M
Other
3.2%$14M

NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHWKNLAGGINGTROX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 258.7x HWKN's $1.1B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, HWKN holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNGVT logoNGVTIngevity Corporat…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$1.5B$280.3B$2.9B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$378M$93M$81.4B$166M$168M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$128M$10M$57.0B-$359M$82M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$246M-$22M$100.9B-$275M$86M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.3%+7.4%+60.0%+5.8%+22.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.8%+0.7%+25.9%-4.8%+10.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.6%+0.7%+20.4%-12.3%+7.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.3%-1.4%+36.0%-9.4%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.2%+7.0%+3.0%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+196.4%-167.4%+16.0%+7.1%-5.1%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ASIX and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.7x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 69% valuation discount to HWKN's 40.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ASIX's 6.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNGVT logoNGVTIngevity Corporat…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.5B$615M$896.0B$1.3B$3.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.7B$978M$1.50T$4.7B$3.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.61x12.67x16.00x-2.70x40.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.60x15.90x14.40x40.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.74x0.90x2.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.05x6.64x18.36x16.58x21.24x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.17x0.40x3.20x0.44x3.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share87.73x0.76x2.47x0.88x6.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.27x95.81x8.88x38.38x
Evenly matched — ASIX and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HWKN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HWKN delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-156 for NGVT. ASIX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGVT's 41.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGVT scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNGVT logoNGVTIngevity Corporat…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-156.1%+1.3%+15.9%-30.4%+16.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.3%+0.6%+1.3%-7.7%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.2%+4.4%+4.5%-0.3%+12.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.1%+5.3%+8.9%-0.4%+14.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966525
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage41.84x0.47x2.60x2.48x0.49x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.2B$363M$599.0B$3.4B$258M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$78M$20M$343.3B$211M$4M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$383M$942.4B$3.6B$261M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.86x1.38x0.74x-1.16x8.52x
HWKN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,471 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, NGVT leads with a +66.6% total return vs ASIX's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 47.3% vs ASIX's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNGVT logoNGVTIngevity Corporat…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.8%+34.3%-0.5%+90.4%+9.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+66.6%-4.2%+21.8%+42.1%+19.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.4%-30.0%+138.2%-23.6%+219.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.8%-12.7%+118.2%-55.3%+397.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.0%+54.4%+465.8%+134.4%+649.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.1%-11.2%+33.6%-8.6%+47.3%
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ASIX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ASIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNGVT logoNGVTIngevity Corporat…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x0.59x0.94x2.33x0.97x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$79.05$26.73$337.25$10.59$186.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.74$14.10$262.71$2.86$117.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.1%+85.3%+95.1%+75.8%+85.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.742.759.145.949.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded211K269K7.0M2.6M144K
Evenly matched — ASIX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and TROX and HWKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NGVT as "Buy", ASIX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", HWKN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for NGVT (target: $77) vs -3.6% for ASIX (target: $22). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.77% vs HWKN's 0.47%.

MetricNGVT logoNGVTIngevity Corporat…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$76.67$22.00$339.75$8.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts13661171
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+1.9%+3.8%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.63$5.95$0.30$0.75
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+0.3%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — JPM and TROX and HWKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallHawkins, Inc. (HWKN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NGVT vs ASIX vs JPM vs TROX vs HWKN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 11. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for Ingevity Corporation (NGVT). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingevity Corporation (NGVT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN?

On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus Hawkins, Inc. at 40. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 46x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN?

Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) delivered a total return of +397. 2%, compared to -55. 3% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +649. 5% versus ASIX's +54. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 33β — meaning TROX is approximately 297% more volatile than ASIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 42% for Ingevity Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 11. 2% versus -17. 0% for Ingevity Corporation (NGVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingevity Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 46x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 2x for Hawkins, Inc. — 25. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NGVT: 6. 5% to $76. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN?

In this comparison, TROX (3.

8% yield), ASIX (2. 8% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), HWKN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NGVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NGVT or ASIX or JPM or TROX or HWKN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 2. 8% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +54. 4%, TROX: +134. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NGVT and ASIX and JPM and TROX and HWKN?

These companies operate in different sectors (NGVT (Basic Materials) and ASIX (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and TROX (Basic Materials) and HWKN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NGVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ASIX, JPM, TROX pay a dividend while NGVT, HWKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.