REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $592M | $3.64B | $13.74B | $5.19B | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $403M | $1.24B | $813M | $309M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-80M | $148M | $632M | $156M | $121M |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 61.3% | 85.5% | 63.5% | 79.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | 48.5% | 64.3% | 29.0% | 53.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 23.4x | 29.8x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.15B | $1.16B | $4.26B | $2.55B | $845M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $20M | $27M | $72M | $14M |
NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Healthcare… (NHPAP) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
| National Health Inv… (NHI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Omega Healthcare In… (OHI) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| Sabra Health Care R… (SBRA) | 100 | 152.9 | +52.9% |
| LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) | 100 | 105.0 | +5.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NHPAP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +60.6% vs NHI's +2.8%
NHI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.08, Low D/E 75.6%, current ratio 2.48x
OHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 110.0% 10Y total return vs NHI's 58.9%
- PEG 1.00 vs LTC's 24.47
- Beta -0.13, yield 5.4%, current ratio 3.46x
- 51.0% margin vs NHPAP's -23.0%
Among these 5 stocks, SBRA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.02, yield 6.0%
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 23.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 25.3% FFO/revenue growth vs NHPAP's 2.3%
- Lower P/E (19.9x vs 29.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% FFO/revenue growth vs NHPAP's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.9x vs 29.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.0% margin vs NHPAP's -23.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (72.7% vs 166.6%) | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NHPAP's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.6% vs NHI's +2.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs NHPAP's -4.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs -4.8% |
NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OHI leads in 1 of 6 categories
LTC leads 1 • NHPAP leads 0 • NHI leads 0 • SBRA leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 4.0x LTC's $309M. OHI is the more profitable business, keeping 51.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NHPAP's -23.0%. On growth, LTC holds the edge at +94.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $403M | $1.2B | $813M | $309M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $282M | $1.1B | $432M | $207M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$80M | $148M | $632M | $156M | $121M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$125M | $226M | $912M | $367M | $137M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +61.3% | +85.5% | +63.5% | +79.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +48.5% | +64.3% | +29.0% | +53.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.0% | +36.8% | +51.0% | +19.2% | +39.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -35.9% | +56.1% | +73.6% | +45.1% | +44.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +29.7% | +16.7% | +20.8% | +94.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.8% | +42.4% | -5.9% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NHPAP and LTC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, LTC trades at a 52% valuation discount to SBRA's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OHI offers better value at 1.02x vs LTC's 24.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $592M | $3.6B | $13.7B | $5.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $4.8B | $18.0B | $7.7B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.91x | 24.85x | 23.78x | 32.16x | 15.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.17x | 23.40x | 29.83x | 19.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.02x | — | 24.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.16x | 16.72x | 17.01x | 16.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 9.61x | 11.47x | 6.70x | 7.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 2.29x | 2.63x | 1.78x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.52x | 15.64x | 14.89x | 14.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OHI and LTC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OHI delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-12 for NHPAP. LTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NHPAP's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHI scores 6/9 vs NHPAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.3% | +9.8% | +11.9% | +5.6% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +5.4% | +6.1% | +2.8% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.8% | +5.6% | +6.0% | +3.8% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +8.0% | +7.9% | +5.2% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.67x | 0.76x | 0.78x | 0.90x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.1B | $4.2B | $2.5B | $830M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $20M | $27M | $72M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.2B | $4.3B | $2.6B | $845M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.78x | 3.45x | 3.83x | 2.40x | 4.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NHPAP and OHI and SBRA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OHI five years ago would be worth $16,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,226 for LTC. Over the past 12 months, NHPAP leads with a +60.6% total return vs NHI's +2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBRA at 28.7% vs LTC's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | -1.1% | +6.6% | +9.0% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.6% | +2.8% | +36.9% | +20.5% | +12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.0% | +73.5% | +86.2% | +113.0% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +31.0% | +63.1% | +49.9% | +22.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.2% | +58.9% | +110.0% | +50.9% | +26.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | +20.2% | +23.0% | +28.7% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OHI and SBRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NHPAP's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBRA currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs NHI's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | -0.08x | -0.13x | -0.06x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.17 | $90.94 | $49.14 | $21.07 | $40.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.42 | $68.80 | $35.09 | $17.08 | $33.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +82.5% | +93.9% | +97.7% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 28.0 | 48.6 | 54.5 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 332K | 1.9M | 2.1M | 347K |
Analyst Outlook
LTC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NHI as "Hold", OHI as "Hold", SBRA as "Hold", LTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.8% upside for NHI (target: $85) vs -6.8% for LTC (target: $36). For income investors, LTC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.97% vs NHPAP's 2.33%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $85.40 | $49.14 | $21.20 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 28 | 29 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +4.8% | +5.4% | +5.8% | +6.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $3.61 | $2.51 | $1.18 | $2.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
OHI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LTC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
NHPAP vs NHI vs OHI vs SBRA vs LTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LTC Properties, Inc.
(LTC) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (NHPAP). LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (19. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC?
On trailing P/E, LTC Properties, Inc.
(LTC) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, LTC Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus LTC Properties, Inc. 's 24. 47x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC?
Over the past 5 years, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) delivered a total return of +63. 1%, compared to +22. 3% for LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OHI returned +110. 0% versus LTC's +26. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 13β versus National Healthcare Properties, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning NHPAP is approximately -235% more volatile than OHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 167% for National Healthcare Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LTC Properties, Inc.
(LTC) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus 2. 3% for National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (NHPAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -136. 5% for National Healthcare Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LTC leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC?
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -53. 6% for National Healthcare Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OHI leads at 62. 6% versus -34. 9% for NHPAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LTC leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (OHI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus LTC Properties, Inc. 's 24. 47x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) trades at 19. 9x forward P/E versus 29. 8x for Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NHI: 13. 8% to $85. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) offers the highest yield at 6. 0%, versus 2. 3% for National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (NHPAP).
09Is NHPAP or NHI or OHI or SBRA or LTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 13), 5. 4% yield, +110. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OHI: +110. 0%, NHPAP: +30. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NHPAP and NHI and OHI and SBRA and LTC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NHPAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OHI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SBRA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LTC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.