NIQ
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.-55.2%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisNIQ
CSGP
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NIQ vs CSGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
Real Estate - Services
Market Cap$13.92B
5Y Perf.-65.5%
NIQ vs CSGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  NIQ |  CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $2.44B | $13.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.31B | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-335M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 52.2% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 24.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.87B | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $519M | $1.73B |
NIQ vs CSGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NIQ
CSGP
| Stock | Jul 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIQ Global Intellig… (NIQ) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 34.5 | -65.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIQ vs CSGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CSGP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. NIQ Global Intelligence Plc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇CSGP emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NIQ
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc
The Growth Play
NIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 60.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 24.1x)
- -56.5% vs CSGP's -60.1%
Best for: growth exposure
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
CSGP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.47
- 57.2% 10Y total return vs NIQ's -56.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  CSGP | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NIQ's 5.7% |
| Value |  NIQ | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 24.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | CSGP | 0.7% margin vs NIQ's -7.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CSGP | Beta 0.47 vs NIQ's 0.85, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NIQ | -56.5% vs CSGP's -60.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CSGP | 0.2% ROA vs NIQ's -4.9%, ROIC -0.9% vs 2.3% |
NIQ vs CSGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
NIQ vs CSGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNIQLAGGINGCSGP
CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
2leads
NIQNIQ Global Intelligen…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CSGPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CSGP5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NIQ5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CSGP6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NIQ5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NIQ and CSGP operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $3.4B in trailing revenue. CSGP is the more profitable business, keeping 0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIQ's -7.8%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NIQNIQ Global Intell… | CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $825M | $278M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$335M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $115M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.2% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.7% | +127.7% |
CSGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NIQ's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 78.4x.
| Metric | NIQNIQ Global Intell… | CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $13.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | 1978.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.48x | 24.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.49x | 78.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 4.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 1.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 102.12x | 339.47x |
NIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGP delivers a 0.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-42 for NIQ. CSGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NIQ's 3.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NIQ scores 6/9 vs CSGP's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NIQNIQ Global Intell… | CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.9% | +0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.16x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | -$589M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $519M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.59x | 1.58x |
CSGP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NIQ five years ago would be worth $4,350 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,733 for CSGP. Over the past 12 months, NIQ leads with a -56.5% total return vs CSGP's -60.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NIQ at -24.2% vs CSGP's -25.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NIQNIQ Global Intell… | CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.6% | -50.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.5% | -60.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | -59.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | -62.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | +57.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.2% | -25.9% |
NIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NIQ and CSGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NIQ's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NIQ currently trades 40.6% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NIQNIQ Global Intell… | CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.39 | $97.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.93 | $31.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.6% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 6.8M |
Evenly matched — NIQ and CSGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NIQ as "Buy" and CSGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.3% upside for CSGP (target: $61) vs 74.1% for NIQ (target: $14).
| Metric | NIQNIQ Global Intell… | CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.40 | $61.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CSGP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NIQ leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallNIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NIQ vs CSGP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIQ or CSGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) offers the better valuation at 1978. 3x trailing P/E (24. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIQ or CSGP?
On forward P/E, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc is actually cheaper at 8.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIQ or CSGP?
Over the past 5 years, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) delivered a total return of -56.
5%, compared to -62. 7% for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGP returned +57. 2% versus NIQ's -56. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIQ or CSGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus NIQ Global Intelligence Plc's 0. 85β — meaning NIQ is approximately 79% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 3% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIQ or CSGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 5. 7% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NIQ Global Intelligence Plc grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NIQ leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIQ or CSGP?
CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -8. 4% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NIQ leads at 3. 4% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIQ or CSGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 86. 3% to $61. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIQ or CSGP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NIQ or CSGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSGP: +57. 2%, NIQ: -56. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIQ and CSGP?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIQ (Technology) and CSGP (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.