NIQ vs CSGP vs VRSK vs ICE

For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.

(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the cheapest at 24. 4x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 1978. 3x. On forward P/E, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. wins at 1. 95x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) delivered a total return of +30. 9%, compared to -62. 7% for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +195. 3% versus NIQ's -56. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 15β versus NIQ Global Intelligence Plc's 0. 85β — meaning NIQ is approximately -671% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.

(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 5. 7% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NIQ Global Intelligence Plc grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NIQ leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -8. 4% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRSK leads at 44. 6% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 95x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 82x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 86. 3% to $61. 18.

In this comparison, ICE (1.

4% yield), VRSK (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NIQ, CSGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 15), 1. 0% yield, +144. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +144. 6%, NIQ: -56. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NIQ (Technology) and CSGP (Real Estate) and VRSK (Industrials) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VRSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VRSK, ICE pay a dividend while NIQ, CSGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.