Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NKGN vs STTK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
NKGN vs STTK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3M | $300M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $652K | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | -83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -36.8% | -52.6% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $54M |
NKGN vs STTK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NKGen Biotech, Inc.… (NKGN) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) | 100 | 242.0 | +142.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NKGN vs STTK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NKGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 71.4%
- 70.2% revenue growth vs STTK's -82.5%
- -36.1% margin vs STTK's -49.9%
STTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.53
- -67.6% 10Y total return vs NKGN's -98.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 11.70x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.2% revenue growth vs STTK's -82.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -36.1% margin vs STTK's -49.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs NKGN's 2.99 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.2% vs NKGN's -55.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -55.7% ROA vs NKGN's -148.7%, ROIC -139.4% vs -203.3% |
NKGN vs STTK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NKGN vs STTK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKGN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1M annually — 1.5x NKGN's $652,000. NKGN is the more profitable business, keeping -36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STTK's -49.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $652,000 | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$50M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | -83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | -52.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | -49.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.2% | -41.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.0% | +51.9% |
Valuation Metrics
STTK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $300M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $247M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -8.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 299.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STTK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STTK scores 4/9 vs NKGN's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -60.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -148.7% | -55.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | -139.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | -62.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STTK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STTK five years ago would be worth $2,121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $105 for NKGN. Over the past 12 months, STTK leads with a +617.6% total return vs NKGN's -55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STTK at 32.4% vs NKGN's -78.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | +68.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.9% | +617.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -78.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.1% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
STTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STTK is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKGN's 2.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STTK currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs NKGN's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.99x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.46 | $8.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.0% | +75.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 562K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
STTK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NKGN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
NKGN vs STTK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NKGN or STTK a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NKGN or STTK?
Over the past 5 years, Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) delivered a total return of -78. 8%, compared to -98. 9% for NKGen Biotech, Inc. Common Stock (NKGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STTK returned -67. 6% versus NKGN's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NKGN or STTK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus NKGen Biotech, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 99β — meaning NKGN is approximately 96% more volatile than STTK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NKGN or STTK?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NKGen Biotech, Inc.
Common Stock grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to 53. 0% for Shattuck Labs, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NKGN or STTK?
NKGen Biotech, Inc.
Common Stock (NKGN) is the more profitable company, earning -36. 1% net margin versus -48. 8% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. — meaning it keeps -36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKGN leads at -36. 8% versus -51. 5% for STTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKGN leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NKGN or STTK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NKGN or STTK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. NKGen Biotech, Inc. Common Stock (NKGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STTK: -67. 6%, NKGN: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NKGN and STTK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.