Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NKTX vs AMGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
NKTX vs AMGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $223M | $177.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $37.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $7.80B |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 31.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $80M | $54.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $9.13B |
NKTX vs AMGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
| Amgen Inc. (AMGN) | 100 | 134.5 | +34.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NKTX vs AMGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.07, Low D/E 19.7%, current ratio 14.45x
- +68.4% vs AMGN's +22.8%
AMGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 88.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 156.4% 10Y total return vs NKTX's -93.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs NKTX's 8.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.9% margin vs NKTX's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs NKTX's 2.07 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.4% vs AMGN's +22.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs NKTX's -24.0%, ROIC 14.8% vs -24.3% |
NKTX vs AMGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NKTX vs AMGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMGN and NKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $37.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$113M | $15.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $7.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$94M | $8.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +31.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +20.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NKTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $177.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $275M | $223.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.97x | 23.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 20.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMGN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMGN delivers a 89.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $89 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NKTX. NKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMGN's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMGN scores 7/9 vs NKTX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.4% | +89.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.0% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.3% | +14.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.6% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 6.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52M | $45.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $9.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $54.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMGN five years ago would be worth $14,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,139 for NKTX. Over the past 12 months, NKTX leads with a +68.4% total return vs AMGN's +22.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMGN at 15.0% vs NKTX's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.4% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.4% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +51.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | +46.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +156.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NKTX and AMGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTX's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $391.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.63 | $261.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 39.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 802K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NKTX as "Buy" and AMGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 585.7% upside for NKTX (target: $22) vs 6.6% for AMGN (target: $351). AMGN is the only dividend payer here at 2.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.60 | $350.76 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $9.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NKTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMGN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NKTX vs AMGN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NKTX or AMGN a better buy right now?
Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NKTX or AMGN?
Over the past 5 years, Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) delivered a total return of +46. 2%, compared to -88. 6% for Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMGN returned +156. 4% versus NKTX's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NKTX or AMGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Nkarta, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning NKTX is approximately 245% more volatile than AMGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NKTX or AMGN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amgen Inc.
grew EPS 88. 2% year-over-year, compared to 33. 3% for Nkarta, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NKTX or AMGN?
Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Nkarta, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMGN leads at 29. 1% versus 0. 0% for NKTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMGN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NKTX or AMGN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTX: 585.
7% to $21. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — NKTX or AMGN?
In this comparison, AMGN (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NKTX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NKTX or AMGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 2. 9% yield, +156. 4% 10Y return). Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMGN: +156. 4%, NKTX: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NKTX and AMGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
AMGN pays a dividend while NKTX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.