Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $223M | $300M | $2.50B | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1M | $236M | $7M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $-50M | $-369M | $-136M |
| Gross Margin | — | -83.5% | 90.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -52.6% | -168.6% | -22.2% |
| Total Debt | $80M | $2M | $99M | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $54M | $222M | $47M |
NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) | 100 | 11.0 | -89.0% |
| Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) | 100 | 24.2 | -75.8% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 113.7 | +13.7% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NKTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 8.0% revenue growth vs STTK's -82.5%
- 3.9% margin vs STTK's -49.9%
- -24.0% ROA vs STTK's -55.7%, ROIC -24.3% vs -139.4%
STTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.53
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 11.70x
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 11.70x
- Beta 1.53 vs FATE's 2.17, lower leverage
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.3%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.2%
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs STTK's -67.6%
FATE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% revenue growth vs STTK's -82.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs STTK's -49.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs FATE's 2.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.2% vs NKTX's +68.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -24.0% ROA vs STTK's -55.7%, ROIC -24.3% vs -139.4% |
NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCUS leads in 1 of 6 categories
NKTX leads 1 • STTK leads 1 • FATE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and NKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -156.4% (RCUS) to -49.9% (STTK). On growth, FATE holds the edge at -26.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1M | $236M | $7M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$113M | -$50M | -$391M | -$148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | -$50M | -$369M | -$136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$94M | -$41M | -$489M | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -83.5% | +90.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -52.6% | -168.6% | -22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -49.9% | -156.4% | -20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -41.3% | -2.1% | -13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -39.3% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +51.9% | +10.5% | +38.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NKTX and STTK and RCUS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $300M | $2.5B | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $275M | $247M | $2.4B | $312M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.97x | -8.94x | -7.54x | -2.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 299.87x | 10.11x | 42.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 5.29x | 4.22x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NKTX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NKTX delivers a -30.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-30 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. STTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATE's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKTX scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.4% | -60.7% | -69.0% | -65.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.0% | -55.7% | -35.3% | -42.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.3% | -139.4% | -64.1% | -36.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.6% | -62.0% | -42.1% | -43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.02x | 0.16x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52M | -$53M | -$123M | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $54M | $222M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $2M | $99M | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -13.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STTK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $8,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, STTK leads with a +617.6% total return vs NKTX's +68.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STTK at 32.4% vs FATE's -23.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.4% | +68.7% | +6.5% | +145.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.4% | +617.6% | +209.6% | +143.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +131.9% | +24.9% | -55.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | -78.8% | -18.6% | -96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -67.6% | +45.9% | +40.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | +32.4% | +7.7% | -23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STTK and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STTK is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs STTK's 75.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 1.53x | 1.95x | 2.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $8.33 | $28.72 | $2.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.63 | $0.71 | $7.06 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +75.2% | +86.3% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 45.0 | 60.5 | 81.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 802K | 562K | 1.2M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NKTX as "Buy", STTK as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.60 | $16.50 | $30.00 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 9 | 18 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCUS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NKTX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
NKTX vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the stronger pick with -4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -82. 5% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). Analysts rate Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus NKTX's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning FATE is approximately 42% more volatile than STTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 38% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is pulling ahead at -4. 3% versus -82. 5% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shattuck Labs, Inc. grew EPS 53. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE?
Nkarta, Inc.
(NKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -48. 8% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKTX leads at 0. 0% versus -51. 5% for STTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NKTX or STTK or RCUS or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STTK: -67. 6%, NKTX: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NKTX and STTK and RCUS and FATE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.