Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NMG vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
NMG vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $334M | $228.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $5.06B |
NMG vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG) | 100 | 139.7 | +39.7% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 243.7 | +143.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMG vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 2.43x
- +19.5% vs LIN's +11.2%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs NMG's -31.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs NMG's -111.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs NMG's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs NMG's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.5% vs LIN's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs -0.1% |
NMG vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NMG vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN and NMG operate at a comparable scale, with $34.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$64M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $334M | $228.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $250.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4730.07x | 33.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 5.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NMG. NMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs NMG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -81.9% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.52x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,823 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, NMG leads with a +19.5% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 11.8% vs NMG's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.8% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +375.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMG's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.3% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NMG as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.4% upside for NMG (target: $6) vs 9.3% for LIN (target: $540). LIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.75 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NMG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NMG vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMG or LIN a better buy right now?
Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33.
8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +73.
9%, compared to -81. 8% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +374. 6% versus NMG's -33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NMG or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
23β versus Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NMG is approximately 771% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NMG or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 0. 0% for NMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is NMG or LIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 176.
4% to $5. 75.
06Which pays a better dividend — NMG or LIN?
In this comparison, LIN (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NMG or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
23), 1. 2% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +374. 6%, NMG: -33. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NMG and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LIN pays a dividend while NMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.