Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NMG logo
NMG
UUUU logo
UUUU
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NMG vs UUUU vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NMG
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$256M
5Y Perf.+8.4%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$3.91B
5Y Perf.+935.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$348.25B
5Y Perf.+81.1%

NMG vs UUUU vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NMG logoNMG
UUUU logoUUUU
KO logoKO
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsUraniumBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$256M$3.91B$348.25B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$85M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-97M$-70M$13.70B
Gross Margin37.3%61.7%
Operating Margin-108.3%29.3%
Forward P/E24.7x
Total Debt$19M$676M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$74M$65M$10.27B

NMG vs UUUU vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NMG
UUUU
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG)100108.4+8.4%
Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU)1001035.8+935.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100181.1+81.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NMG vs UUUU vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NMG
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
The Income Pick

NMG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 2.49
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.49, Low D/E 24.3%, current ratio 0.87x
  • Beta 2.49 vs UUUU's 2.66, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

UUUU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs KO's 118.2%
  • Beta 2.66, current ratio 30.69x
  • +169.7% vs NMG's -8.6%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 1.9% revenue growth vs NMG's -104.6%
  • 27.8% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKO logoKO1.9% revenue growth vs NMG's -104.6%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
Stability / SafetyNMG logoNMGBeta 2.49 vs UUUU's 2.66, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)UUUU logoUUUU+169.7% vs NMG's -8.6%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NMG's -57.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -96.1%

NMG vs UUUU vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NMGNouveau Monde Graphite Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

NMG vs UUUU vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNMG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and NMG operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UUUU's -82.7%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$85M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10M-$94M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$97M-$70M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$56M-$96M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.3%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-108.3%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-82.7%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-113.2%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+112.1%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+65.5%+64.2%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NMG and UUUU and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$256M$3.9B$348.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$216M$4.5B$383.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.22x-42.27x26.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue59.28x7.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.29x5.33x10.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF65.76x
Evenly matched — NMG and UUUU and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-118 for NMG. NMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NMG's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-117.5%-10.2%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-57.4%-6.5%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-96.1%-8.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.5%-10.5%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9127
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.24x0.99x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$55M$611M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$74M$65M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19M$676M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-93.51x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UUUU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $23,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,438 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +169.7% total return vs NMG's -8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 34.2% vs NMG's -21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-38.8%-6.2%+18.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-8.6%+169.7%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.7%+141.7%+42.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.6%+137.0%+63.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%+508.6%+118.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-21.5%+34.2%+12.6%
UUUU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UUUU's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 26.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.49x2.66x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.06$27.90$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.37$5.33$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.2%+56.1%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.239.060.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M9.4M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NMG as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 193.7% upside for NMG (target: $5) vs 6.5% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.67$22.33$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts2848
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UUUU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NMG vs UUUU vs KO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NMG or UUUU or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (24. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or UUUU or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.

(UUUU) delivered a total return of +137. 0%, compared to -85. 6% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +508. 6% versus NMG's -47. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NMG or UUUU or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Energy Fuels Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning UUUU is approximately -1431% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NMG or UUUU or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.

9% versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for Energy Fuels Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NMG or UUUU or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NMG or UUUU or KO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 193.

7% to $4. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NMG or UUUU or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. NMG, UUUU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NMG or UUUU or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, NMG: -47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NMG and UUUU and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (NMG (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KO pays a dividend while NMG, UUUU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.