Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NMG
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$334M
5Y Perf.+41.8%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$5.80B
5Y Perf.+1447.0%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+593.4%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.+80.3%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.37B
5Y Perf.+156.9%

NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NMG logoNMG
UUUU logoUUUU
MP logoMP
LAC logoLAC
ALB logoALB
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsUraniumIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$334M$5.80B$12.28B$1.37B$23.37B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$85M$305M$0.00$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-132M$-70M$-71M$-241M$-233M
Gross Margin37.3%8.3%18.5%
Operating Margin-108.3%-36.4%5.6%
Forward P/E274.3x22.4x
Total Debt$19M$676M$1.04B$23M$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$106M$65M$1.17B$594M$1.62B

NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NMG
UUUU
MP
LAC
ALB
StockJun 20May 26Return
Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG)100141.8+41.8%
Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU)1001547.0+1447.0%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100693.4+593.4%
Lithium Americas Co… (LAC)100180.3+80.3%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100256.9+156.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ALB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. MP Materials Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. UUUU and LAC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NMG
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NMG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

UUUU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs MP's 5.9%
  • +391.8% vs NMG's +19.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Income Pick

MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 1.40
  • Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
  • Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
  • 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Defensive Pick

LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
  • 1.4% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Value Play

ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • -1.4% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.1%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
ValueALB logoALBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLAC logoLAC1.4% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.40 vs NMG's 1.89
DividendsALB logoALB0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)UUUU logoUUUU+391.8% vs NMG's +19.5%
Efficiency (ROA)ALB logoALB-1.4% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.1%

NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NMGNouveau Monde Graphite Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M
LACLithium Americas Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALBLAGGINGLAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ALB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALB and LAC operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALB is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UUUU's -82.7%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$85M$305M$0$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3M-$94M-$43M-$32M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$132M-$70M-$71M-$241M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$64M-$87M-$314M-$648M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.3%+8.3%+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-108.3%-36.4%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-82.7%-23.3%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-102.5%-102.8%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+112.1%+49.1%+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.0%+64.2%+121.4%-21.4%
ALB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$334M$5.8B$12.3B$1.4B$23.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$270M$6.4B$12.2B$801M$25.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4730.07x-63.14x-138.26x-26.95x-34.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.274.33x22.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple33.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue87.96x44.59x4.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.09x7.96x4.92x1.20x2.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.76x
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALB delivers a -2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NMG. LAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UUUU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.7%-10.2%-3.7%-26.9%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-81.9%-6.5%-2.0%-16.6%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.1%-8.5%-4.7%-7.1%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.1%-10.5%-4.2%-3.9%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922426
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.99x0.44x0.02x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$87M$611M-$123M-$571M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$106M$65M$1.2B$594M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19M$676M$1.0B$23M$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-98.52x-2.80x1.59x
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $37,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,823 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +391.8% total return vs NMG's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 56.9% vs LAC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.0%+40.0%+25.8%+18.7%+38.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.5%+391.8%+192.7%+84.4%+256.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.1%+286.1%+221.7%-55.6%+9.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.8%+272.6%+149.7%-31.3%+26.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.9%+996.7%+591.3%+234.9%+217.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.6%+56.9%+47.6%-23.7%+3.0%
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MP and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMG's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.89x1.85x1.40x1.42x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.06$27.90$100.25$10.52$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.60$4.20$18.64$2.47$53.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.3%+83.7%+69.0%+53.8%+89.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.762.166.869.153.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M10.1M5.6M9.0M2.0M
Evenly matched — MP and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NMG as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", MP as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 176.4% upside for NMG (target: $6) vs -3.8% for ALB (target: $191). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNMG logoNMGNouveau Monde Gra…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.75$24.08$78.25$7.00$190.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts28111545
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ALB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UUUU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallAlbemarle Corporation (ALB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.

(UUUU) delivered a total return of +272. 6%, compared to -81. 8% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +996. 7% versus NMG's -31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NMG is approximately 35% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 99% for Energy Fuels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?

Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.

(NMG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UUUU leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 22.

4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 252. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 176. 4% to $5. 75.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?

In this comparison, ALB (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. NMG, UUUU, MP, LAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, NMG: -31. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NMG and UUUU and MP and LAC and ALB?

These companies operate in different sectors (NMG (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and MP (Basic Materials) and LAC (Basic Materials) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALB pays a dividend while NMG, UUUU, MP, LAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NMG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UUUU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 56%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.