Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Uranium
Industrial Materials
Industrial Materials
Chemicals - Specialty
NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Uranium | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $334M | $5.80B | $12.28B | $1.37B | $23.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $85M | $305M | $0.00 | $5.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $-70M | $-71M | $-241M | $-233M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.3% | 8.3% | — | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -108.3% | -36.4% | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 274.3x | — | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $676M | $1.04B | $23M | $3.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $65M | $1.17B | $594M | $1.62B |
NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 1547.0 | +1447.0% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
| Lithium Americas Co… (LAC) | 100 | 180.3 | +80.3% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 256.9 | +156.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NMG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UUUU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs MP's 5.9%
- +391.8% vs NMG's +19.5%
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.40
- Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
- 1.4% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- -1.4% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs UUUU's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs NMG's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +391.8% vs NMG's +19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.1% |
NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALB leads in 3 of 6 categories
UUUU leads 1 • NMG leads 0 • MP leads 0 • LAC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB and LAC operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALB is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UUUU's -82.7%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $85M | $305M | $0 | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$94M | -$43M | -$32M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | -$70M | -$71M | -$241M | -$233M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$64M | -$87M | -$314M | -$648M | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.3% | +8.3% | — | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -108.3% | -36.4% | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -82.7% | -23.3% | — | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -102.5% | -102.8% | — | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +112.1% | +49.1% | — | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +64.2% | +121.4% | -21.4% | — |
Valuation Metrics
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $334M | $5.8B | $12.3B | $1.4B | $23.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $6.4B | $12.2B | $801M | $25.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4730.07x | -63.14x | -138.26x | -26.95x | -34.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 274.33x | — | 22.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 33.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 87.96x | 44.59x | — | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 7.96x | 4.92x | 1.20x | 2.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 33.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB delivers a -2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NMG. LAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UUUU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -10.2% | -3.7% | -26.9% | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -81.9% | -6.5% | -2.0% | -16.6% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -8.5% | -4.7% | -7.1% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -10.5% | -4.2% | -3.9% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.99x | 0.44x | 0.02x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $611M | -$123M | -$571M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $65M | $1.2B | $594M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $676M | $1.0B | $23M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.52x | — | -2.80x | — | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $37,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,823 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +391.8% total return vs NMG's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 56.9% vs LAC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | +40.0% | +25.8% | +18.7% | +38.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | +391.8% | +192.7% | +84.4% | +256.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +286.1% | +221.7% | -55.6% | +9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.8% | +272.6% | +149.7% | -31.3% | +26.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +996.7% | +591.3% | +234.9% | +217.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | +56.9% | +47.6% | -23.7% | +3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MP and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMG's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.85x | 1.40x | 1.42x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $27.90 | $100.25 | $10.52 | $221.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $4.20 | $18.64 | $2.47 | $53.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.3% | +83.7% | +69.0% | +53.8% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 62.1 | 66.8 | 69.1 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 10.1M | 5.6M | 9.0M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NMG as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", MP as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 176.4% upside for NMG (target: $6) vs -3.8% for ALB (target: $191). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.75 | $24.08 | $78.25 | $7.00 | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UUUU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NMG vs UUUU vs MP vs LAC vs ALB: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) delivered a total return of +272. 6%, compared to -81. 8% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +996. 7% versus NMG's -31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NMG is approximately 35% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 99% for Energy Fuels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
(NMG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UUUU leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 22.
4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 252. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 176. 4% to $5. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB?
In this comparison, ALB (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NMG, UUUU, MP, LAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NMG or UUUU or MP or LAC or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, NMG: -31. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NMG and UUUU and MP and LAC and ALB?
These companies operate in different sectors (NMG (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and MP (Basic Materials) and LAC (Basic Materials) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALB pays a dividend while NMG, UUUU, MP, LAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.