Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NMM vs KEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
NMM vs KEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $2.07B | $7.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262M | $355M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 4.8x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $270M | $79M |
NMM vs KEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navios Maritime Par… (NMM) | 100 | 1069.8 | +969.8% |
| Kirby Corporation (KEX) | 100 | 277.3 | +177.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMM vs KEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 0.3%
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs KEX's 123.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.08x
KEX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 28.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- 3.0% revenue growth vs NMM's 2.1%
- 5.9% ROA vs NMM's 4.4%, ROIC 8.2% vs 8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs NMM's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs KEX's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs KEX's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.4% vs KEX's +39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs NMM's 4.4%, ROIC 8.2% vs 8.3% |
NMM vs KEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NMM vs KEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NMM and KEX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 2.6x NMM's $1.3B. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KEX's 10.5%. On growth, KEX holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $693M | $756M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $262M | $355M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $406M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.7% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.6% | +127.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NMM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 73% valuation discount to KEX's 22.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KEX's 11.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.97x | 22.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.81x | 20.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.85x | 11.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.55x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KEX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KEX delivers a 10.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for NMM. KEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NMM's 0.46x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $270M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.78x | 11.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,089 for KEX. Over the past 12 months, NMM leads with a +99.4% total return vs KEX's +39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 46.9% vs KEX's 25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +99.4% | +39.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.8% | +98.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.5% | +110.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +267.2% | +123.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.9% | +25.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KEX's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.90 | $157.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.05 | $79.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 166K | 702K |
Analyst Outlook
NMM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NMM as "Hold" and KEX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs 6.4% for KEX (target: $151). NMM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.00 | $151.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +4.6% |
NMM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KEX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
NMM vs KEX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMM or KEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kirby Corporation (KEX) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kirby Corporation (KEX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NMM or KEX?
On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Kirby Corporation at 22. 5x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NMM or KEX?
Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +110. 9% for Kirby Corporation (KEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMM returned +267. 2% versus KEX's +123. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NMM or KEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Kirby Corporation's 0. 83β — meaning KEX is approximately 14% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kirby Corporation (KEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 46% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NMM or KEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kirby Corporation (KEX) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus 2. 1% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kirby Corporation grew EPS 28. 9% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NMM or KEX?
Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 5% net margin versus 10. 5% for Kirby Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMM leads at 33. 6% versus 14. 6% for KEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NMM or KEX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Kirby Corporation — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NMM or KEX?
In this comparison, NMM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. KEX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NMM or KEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), +267. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NMM: +267. 2%, KEX: +123. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NMM and KEX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.