Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NMRA vs LLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
NMRA vs LLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $330M | $1.07T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $72.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-222M | $25.27B |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 45.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $477K | $42.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $7.16B |
NMRA vs LLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neumora Therapeutic… (NMRA) | 100 | 12.6 | -87.4% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 210.9 | +110.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMRA vs LLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMRA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.90, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 5.87x
- +98.3% vs LLY's +40.3%
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs NMRA's -89.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs NMRA's 13.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs NMRA's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs NMRA's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.3% vs LLY's +40.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs NMRA's -119.2%, ROIC 41.8% vs -5.3% |
NMRA vs LLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NMRA vs LLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and NMRA operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $72.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$223M | $34.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$222M | $25.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$193M | $13.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +169.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NMRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $330M | $1.07T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $148M | $1.11T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.23x | 49.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 16.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.80x | 38.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 119.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-182 for NMRA. NMRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs NMRA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -181.7% | +101.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.2% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.3% | +41.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -108.2% | +46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$182M | $35.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $477,000 | $42.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -47.51x | 35.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,095 for NMRA. Over the past 12 months, NMRA leads with a +98.3% total return vs LLY's +40.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 37.2% vs NMRA's -52.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +98.3% | +40.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +158.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +412.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +1484.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.2% | +37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMRA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs NMRA's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $1182.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NMRA as "Buy" and LLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 293.3% upside for NMRA (target: $7) vs 12.0% for LLY (target: $1269). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $1268.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
LLY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NMRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NMRA vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMRA or LLY a better buy right now?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) offers the better valuation at 49.
4x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NMRA or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.
1%, compared to -89. 0% for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus NMRA's -89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NMRA or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 90β — meaning NMRA is approximately 260% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NMRA or LLY?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96.
0% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NMRA or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for NMRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NMRA or LLY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMRA: 293.
3% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NMRA or LLY?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. NMRA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NMRA or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, NMRA: -89. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NMRA and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NMRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock. LLY pays a dividend while NMRA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.