Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $330M | $6.23B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $827M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-222M | $-187M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -8.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 84.8x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $477K | $492M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $985M | $343.34B |
NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neumora Therapeutic… (NMRA) | 100 | 12.6 | -87.4% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 221.2 | +121.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMRA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.90, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 5.87x
- +98.3% vs JPM's +21.8%
PTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.89
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 20.4% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs PTCT's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs NMRA's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.3% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs NMRA's -119.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -5.3% |
NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and NMRA operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $827M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$223M | -$21M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$222M | -$187M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$193M | -$229M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +77.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -8.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -22.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -27.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | -100.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 40% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $330M | $6.2B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $148M | $5.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.23x | 9.66x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 84.80x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.41x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.60x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.80x | — | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.87x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-182 for NMRA. NMRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs NMRA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -181.7% | — | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.2% | -6.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.3% | — | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -108.2% | +55.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$182M | -$492M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $985M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $477,000 | $492M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -47.51x | -1.00x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,095 for NMRA. Over the past 12 months, NMRA leads with a +98.3% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NMRA's -52.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | -2.1% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +98.3% | +47.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +73.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +71.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +995.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.2% | +20.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTCT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMRA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs NMRA's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 0.89x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $87.50 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $43.18 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +85.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 59.5 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NMRA as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 293.3% upside for NMRA (target: $7) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $95.83 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
NMRA vs PTCT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMRA or PTCT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (84. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NMRA or PTCT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NMRA or PTCT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -89. 0% for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +995. 3% versus NMRA's -89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NMRA or PTCT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 90β — meaning NMRA is approximately 113% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NMRA or PTCT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NMRA or PTCT or JPM?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus 0. 0% for NMRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NMRA or PTCT or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 84. 8x for PTC Therapeutics, Inc. — 70. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMRA: 293. 3% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NMRA or PTCT or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NMRA, PTCT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NMRA or PTCT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (NMRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, NMRA: -89. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NMRA and PTCT and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NMRA (Healthcare) and PTCT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NMRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while NMRA, PTCT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.