Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NNBR vs IIIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
NNBR vs IIIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $139M | $527M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $435M | $678M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 2.3% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 43.6x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $211M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $39M |
NNBR vs IIIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NN, Inc. (NNBR) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNBR vs IIIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NNBR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.04
- +50.8% vs IIIN's -18.7%
IIIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 48.0% 10Y total return vs NNBR's -75.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs NNBR's -9.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 43.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.0% margin vs NNBR's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs NNBR's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.8% vs IIIN's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs NNBR's -7.7%, ROIC 14.1% vs -4.5% |
NNBR vs IIIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NNBR vs IIIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $678M annually — 1.6x NNBR's $435M. IIIN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNBR's -8.0%. On growth, IIIN holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $435M | $678M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $439,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +15.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.7% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NNBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IIIN's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NNBR's 19.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $527M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $338M | $492M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.58x | 12.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 43.60x | 16.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.03x | 6.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.16x | 27.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-28 for NNBR. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NNBR's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIIN scores 6/9 vs NNBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.4% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | +10.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.5% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.44x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $211M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.74x | 1192.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IIIN five years ago would be worth $8,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,660 for NNBR. Over the past 12 months, NNBR leads with a +50.8% total return vs IIIN's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNBR at 40.7% vs IIIN's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +106.0% | -16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.8% | -18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.4% | +10.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | -12.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.7% | +48.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNBR and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IIIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NNBR's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNBR currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs IIIN's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.99 | $41.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $24.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.6 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 936K | 211K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NNBR as "Buy" and IIIN as "Buy". IIIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
IIIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NNBR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NNBR vs IIIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNBR or IIIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NN, Inc. (NNBR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NNBR or IIIN?
On forward P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NNBR or IIIN?
Over the past 5 years, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) delivered a total return of -12. 0%, compared to -63. 4% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIIN returned +48. 0% versus NNBR's -75. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NNBR or IIIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus NN, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NNBR is approximately 102% more volatile than IIIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 144% for NN, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NNBR or IIIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for NN, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNBR leads at -5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NNBR or IIIN?
Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -8. 1% for NN, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIIN leads at 8. 4% versus -4. 3% for NNBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIIN leads at 14. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NNBR or IIIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 6x for NN, Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NNBR or IIIN?
In this comparison, IIIN (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. NNBR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NNBR or IIIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 4. 1% yield). NN, Inc. (NNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIIN: +48. 0%, NNBR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NNBR and IIIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. IIIN pays a dividend while NNBR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.