NNDM vs XMTR

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 25. 9% for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR). Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Xometry, Inc.

(XMTR) delivered a total return of -10. 2%, compared to -72. 3% for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XMTR returned -10. 2% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 74β versus Xometry, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XMTR is approximately 11% more volatile than NNDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus 25. 9% for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xometry, Inc. grew EPS -18. 4% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Xometry, Inc.

(XMTR) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 0% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps -9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XMTR leads at -6. 6% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XMTR leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Xometry, Inc.

(XMTR) trades at 117. 0x forward P/E versus 185. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 68. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNDM: -97. 5%, XMTR: -10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NNDM (Technology) and XMTR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.