NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
Medical - Devices
Market Cap$115M
5Y Perf.-93.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.-64.5%
ALKS
Alkermes plc
Biotechnology
Market Cap$5.90B
5Y Perf.+7.8%
HOLO
MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NNOX | DBVT | ALKS | HOLO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $115M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $321M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $-168M | $153M | $295M |
| Gross Margin | -98.8% | — | 65.4% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | -469.7% | — | 12.3% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $22M | $70M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $194M | $1.12B | $851M |
NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NNOX
DBVT
ALKS
HOLO
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) | 100 | 7.0 | -93.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 35.5 | -64.5% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| MicroCloud Hologram… (HOLO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HOLO leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. DBV Technologies S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ALKS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
The Secondary Option
NNOX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: healthcare exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Income Pick
DBVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- +110.4% vs HOLO's -78.7%
Best for: income & stability
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Long-Run Compounder
ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06 vs HOLO's 2.19
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
HOLO
MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
The Growth Play
HOLO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 42.6%, EPS growth 94.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 42.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 91.9% margin vs NNOX's -452.8%
- 10.0% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HOLO | 42.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | HOLO | 91.9% margin vs NNOX's -452.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ALKS | Beta 1.06 vs HOLO's 2.19 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DBVT | +110.4% vs HOLO's -78.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HOLO | 10.0% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2024
NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLALKSLAGGINGDBVT
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories
HOLO leads 1 • NNOX leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
0leads
NNOXNano-X Imaging Ltd.
0leads
HOLOMicroCloud Hologram I…
1leads
ALKSAlkermes plc
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HOLOvs NNOXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ALKS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HOLO2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ALKS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ALKS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. HOLO is the more profitable business, keeping 91.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNOX's -4.5%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NNOXNano-X Imaging Lt… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | HOLOMicroCloud Hologr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $0 | $1.6B | $321M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | -$112M | $212M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | -$168M | $153M | $295M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | -$151M | $392M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -98.8% | — | +65.4% | +24.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | — | +12.3% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | — | +9.8% | +91.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | — | +25.1% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.7% | — | +28.2% | +24.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +153.4% |
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HOLO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NNOXNano-X Imaging Lt… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | HOLOMicroCloud Hologr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $115M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | -$121M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.93x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -0.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.20x | — | 4.00x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | — |
HOLO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOLO delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. HOLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs HOLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NNOXNano-X Imaging Lt… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | HOLOMicroCloud Hologr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.5% | -130.2% | +8.8% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.9% | — | +18.9% | -27.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.4% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$32M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$844M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $194M | $1.1B | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $22M | $70M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -379.29x | -189.82x | 32.30x | — |
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for HOLO. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs HOLO's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs HOLO's -95.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NNOXNano-X Imaging Lt… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | HOLOMicroCloud Hologr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.8% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -37.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.4% | +110.4% | +16.5% | -78.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.4% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -95.1% |
Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOLO's 2.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs HOLO's 14.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NNOXNano-X Imaging Lt… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | HOLOMicroCloud Hologr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 2.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.86 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $11.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.66 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $1.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.0% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +14.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.5 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 252K | 2.3M | 722K |
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNOX as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 922.7% upside for NNOX (target: $18) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44).
| Metric | NNOXNano-X Imaging Lt… | DBVTDBV Technologies … | ALKSAlkermes plc | HOLOMicroCloud Hologr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $46.33 | $44.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HOLO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAlkermes plc (ALKS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NNOX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HOLO: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
(HOLO) is the stronger pick with 42. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -100. 0% for MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -11. 0% versus HOLO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus MicroCloud Hologram Inc. 's 2. 19β — meaning HOLO is approximately 107% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
(HOLO) is pulling ahead at 42. 6% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MicroCloud Hologram Inc. grew EPS 94. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNOX leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -474. 3% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -502. 9% for NNOX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NNOX or DBVT or ALKS or HOLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06)). MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKS: -11. 0%, HOLO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NNOX and DBVT and ALKS and HOLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NNOX (Healthcare) and DBVT (Healthcare) and ALKS (Healthcare) and HOLO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NNOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.