Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NOEMU
CO2 Energy Transition Corp. Unit

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$99M
5Y Perf.+18.5%
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-19.5%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.34B
5Y Perf.+0.9%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.75B
5Y Perf.+393.6%
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$721M
5Y Perf.-45.0%

NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NOEMU logoNOEMU
CLNE logoCLNE
PLUG logoPLUG
BE logoBE
FCEL logoFCEL
IndustryShell CompaniesOil & Gas Refining & MarketingElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$99M$485M$4.34B$62.75B$721M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$439M$710M$2.45B$170M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$-99M$-1.63B$6M$-183M
Gross Margin11.7%99.8%31.1%-15.9%
Operating Margin7.4%38.1%8.2%-67.6%
Forward P/E9999.0x123.5x
Total Debt$12K$99M$997M$2.99B$144M
Cash & Equiv.$953K$158M$1M$2.45B$295M

NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCELLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NOEMU
CLNE
PLUG
BE
FCEL
StockNov 24May 26Return
CO2 Energy Transiti… (NOEMU)100118.5+18.5%
Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE)10080.5-19.5%
Plug Power Inc. (PLUG)100100.9+0.9%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)100493.6+393.6%
FuelCell Energy, In… (FCEL)10055.0-45.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NOEMU and BE are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Bloom Energy Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. FCEL and CLNE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NOEMU
CO2 Energy Transition Corp. Unit
The Banking Pick

NOEMU has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 0.4% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
  • 1.8% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC -0.5% vs 10.9%
Best for: quality and efficiency
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
The Defensive Pick

CLNE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.32x
  • Beta 1.04 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 9.4% 10Y total return vs NOEMU's 18.6%
  • Better valuation composite
  • +14.1% vs NOEMU's +14.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick

FCEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.90, yield 0.9%
  • Rev growth 41.0%, EPS growth -14.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
  • Beta 2.90, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.63x
  • 41.0% revenue growth vs CLNE's 2.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFCEL logoFCEL41.0% revenue growth vs CLNE's 2.2%
ValueBE logoBEBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNOEMU logoNOEMU0.4% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Stability / SafetyCLNE logoCLNEBeta 1.04 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
DividendsFCEL logoFCEL0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+14.1% vs NOEMU's +14.7%
Efficiency (ROA)NOEMU logoNOEMU1.8% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC -0.5% vs 10.9%

NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NOEMUCO2 Energy Transition Corp. Unit

Segment breakdown not available.

CLNEClean Energy Fuels Corp.
FY 2025
Product
77.0%$365M
Service
12.5%$59M
Station construction sales
7.2%$34M
LCFS Credits
2.7%$13M
Other services
0.6%$3M
Federal Alternative Fuels Tax Credit
0.0%$198,000
PLUGPlug Power Inc.
FY 2025
Sale Of Electrolyzers
26.5%$188M
Fuel Delivered To Customers
18.8%$133M
Power Purchase Agreements
15.2%$108M
Sale of cryogenic equipment
13.5%$96M
Services Performed On Fuel Cell Systems And Related Infrastructure
13.3%$94M
Sales Of Fuel Cell Systems
7.6%$54M
Sale Of Hydrogen Infrastructure
3.8%$27M
Other (2)
1.4%$10M
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M
FCELFuelCell Energy, Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity, Generation
53.8%$172M
Product
34.8%$111M
Advanced Technologies
8.3%$27M
Service
3.1%$10M

NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNOEMULAGGINGPLUG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BE and NOEMU operate at a comparable scale, with $2.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (BE) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNOEMU logoNOEMUCO2 Energy Transi…CLNE logoCLNEClean Energy Fuel…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$439M$710M$2.4B$170M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$788,698$62M-$1.5B$240M-$84M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M-$99M-$1.6B$6M-$183M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$900,105$19M-$2M$233M-$126M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.7%+99.8%+31.1%-15.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%+38.1%+8.2%-67.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-22.7%-2.3%+0.2%-108.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.3%-0.3%+9.5%-74.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.3%+17.6%+130.4%+60.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+90.0%+95.9%+3.3%+65.5%
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CLNE's 90.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NOEMU's 1515.8x.

MetricNOEMU logoNOEMUCO2 Energy Transi…CLNE logoCLNEClean Energy Fuel…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …
Market CapShares × price$99M$485M$4.3B$62.8B$721M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$98M$426M$5.3B$63.3B$570M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9999.00x-2.19x-705.49x-1.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1515.79x90.01x513.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.14x6.12x31.00x4.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x0.86x79.14x0.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.10x1097.28x
CLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NOEMU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NOEMU delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. NOEMU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLNE scores 5/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNOEMU logoNOEMUCO2 Energy Transi…CLNE logoCLNEClean Energy Fuel…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.9%-17.2%-124.4%+0.8%-26.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.8%-9.2%-64.3%+0.2%-20.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.5%-9.4%+10.9%+4.1%-14.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.7%-9.4%+18.6%+2.5%-13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.18x19.75x3.77x0.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$941,339-$59M$996M$538M-$151M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$953,069$158M$1M$2.5B$295M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11,730$99M$997M$3.0B$144M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense156.21x-1.07x-36.18x1.05x-30.14x
NOEMU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $129,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $630 for FCEL. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1414.1% total return vs NOEMU's +14.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.8% vs FCEL's -42.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNOEMU logoNOEMUCO2 Energy Transi…CLNE logoCLNEClean Energy Fuel…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.1%+2.3%+39.9%+164.5%+67.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+14.7%+29.2%+266.9%+1414.1%+227.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.6%-48.6%-66.4%+1440.0%-80.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.6%-74.8%-84.5%+1199.3%-93.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.6%-30.1%+61.7%+944.1%-99.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.9%-19.9%-30.5%+148.8%-42.4%
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NOEMU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NOEMU is the less volatile stock with a -0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NOEMU currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 68.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNOEMU logoNOEMUCO2 Energy Transi…CLNE logoCLNEClean Energy Fuel…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.21x1.04x2.55x3.62x2.90x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.88$3.11$4.58$302.99$14.30
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.28$1.60$0.69$16.47$3.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.7%+71.1%+68.1%+86.2%+95.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.449.056.260.361.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded261.4M75.2M10.2M3.9M
NOEMU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CLNE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy", FCEL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for CLNE (target: $4) vs -36.3% for FCEL (target: $9). FCEL is the only dividend payer here at 0.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNOEMU logoNOEMUCO2 Energy Transi…CLNE logoCLNEClean Energy Fuel…PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…FCEL logoFCELFuelCell Energy, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$3.91$187.56$8.73
# AnalystsCovering analysts22383119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NOEMU leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallCO2 Energy Transition Corp.… (NOEMU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NOEMU vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FuelCell Energy, Inc.

(FCEL) is the stronger pick with 41. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). CO2 Energy Transition Corp. Unit (NOEMU) offers the better valuation at 9999. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1199%, compared to -93.

7% for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus FCEL's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CO2 Energy Transition Corp.

Unit (NOEMU) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 21β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately -1807% more volatile than NOEMU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CO2 Energy Transition Corp. Unit (NOEMU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FuelCell Energy, Inc.

(FCEL) is pulling ahead at 41. 0% versus 2. 2% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CO2 Energy Transition Corp. Unit grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1414. 3% for FuelCell Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL?

CO2 Energy Transition Corp.

Unit (NOEMU) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -76. 6% for FCEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLNE: 58.

4% to $3. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL?

In this comparison, FCEL (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. NOEMU, CLNE, PLUG, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NOEMU or CLNE or PLUG or BE or FCEL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CO2 Energy Transition Corp.

Unit (NOEMU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 21)). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOEMU: +18. 6%, PLUG: +61. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NOEMU and CLNE and PLUG and BE and FCEL?

These companies operate in different sectors (NOEMU (Financial Services) and CLNE (Energy) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials) and FCEL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NOEMU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock. FCEL pays a dividend while NOEMU, CLNE, PLUG, BE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NOEMU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLNE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLUG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCEL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.