Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.53B | $47M | $2.34B | $693M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.06B | $165M | $4.71B | $1.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-623M | $12M | $638M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 72.8% | 43.9% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | -4.0% | 31.1% | -58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 12.4x | 6.8x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.40B | $23M | $4.49B | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $28M | $76M | $40M |
NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Oil and Ga… (NOG) | 100 | 307.3 | +207.3% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 7.3%
- -34.4% 10Y total return vs CIVI's -86.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.60, yield 7.3%, current ratio 1.09x
BATL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +128.8% vs NOG's +5.3%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
- 13.6% margin vs VTLE's -69.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -0.3%
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs VTLE's -69.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs VTLE's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BATL's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs NOG's +5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -0.3% |
NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VTLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
NOG leads 1 • BATL leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BATL and CIVI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 28.5x BATL's $165M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTLE's -69.3%. On growth, NOG holds the edge at -6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $165M | $4.7B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $74M | $3.4B | -$334M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$623M | $12M | $638M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | $39M | $934M | $656M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +72.8% | +43.9% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | -4.0% | +31.1% | -58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | +7.2% | +13.6% | -69.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +23.7% | +19.8% | +34.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | -37.0% | -8.1% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +59.0% | -33.9% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 95% valuation discount to NOG's 61.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VTLE's 4.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $47M | $2.3B | $693M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $42M | $6.8B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.38x | -1.28x | 3.24x | -3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.80x | 12.43x | 6.75x | 3.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.44x | — | 1.89x | 4.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 0.29x | 0.45x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | — | 0.41x | 0.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.02x | 1.20x | 2.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BATL and CIVI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. CIVI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NOG's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs VTLE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.1% | +14.5% | +9.5% | -74.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.3% | +2.4% | +4.2% | -27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.0% | -3.4% | +10.8% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | -1.8% | +12.1% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | — | 0.68x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | -$5M | $4.4B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $28M | $76M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $23M | $4.5B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 0.57x | 2.80x | -5.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NOG five years ago would be worth $18,177 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs NOG's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NOG at -3.3% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +140.3% | -1.5% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | +128.8% | +6.8% | +28.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -54.3% | -41.7% | -59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.8% | -77.5% | +31.9% | -51.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | -72.1% | -86.2% | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | -23.0% | -16.5% | -25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATL and VTLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTLE currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | -1.71x | 1.10x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.62 | $29.70 | $37.45 | $22.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.18 | $1.00 | $25.38 | $13.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +9.6% | +73.1% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 37.6 | 54.8 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 16.6M | 22.4M | 17 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NOG and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NOG as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", VTLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for VTLE (target: $23) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs NOG's 7.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | — | $31.00 | $23.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 2 | 16 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | +100.0% | +18.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.75 | $2.96 | $4.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% | +18.3% | +0.5% |
VTLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NOG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
NOG vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. at 61. 4x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE?
Over the past 5 years, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
(NOG) delivered a total return of +81. 8%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOG returned -34. 4% versus VTLE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately -177% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 113% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NOG leads at 29. 3% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), NOG (7. 3% yield) pay a dividend. VTLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NOG or BATL or CIVI or VTLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, VTLE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NOG and BATL and CIVI and VTLE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NOG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock. NOG, BATL, CIVI pay a dividend while VTLE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.