Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $2.53B | $3.23B | $47M | $28.19B | $32.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.06B | $1.42B | $165M | $12.24B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-623M | $594M | $12M | $2.15B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 47.8% | 72.8% | 21.8% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 40.2% | -4.0% | 18.9% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 7.0x | 12.4x | 8.6x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.40B | $789M | $23M | $8.78B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $2M | $28M | $1.43B | $2.21B |
NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Oil and Ga… (NOG) | 100 | 131.5 | +31.5% |
| Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 23.1 | -76.9% |
| Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN) | 100 | 170.8 | +70.8% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NOG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 7.3%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.8x)
GPOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 245.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.2%
- 145.1% 10Y total return vs DVN's 99.0%
- 42.5% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
- 41.9% margin vs NOG's -30.3%
BATL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NOG's 7.3%
- +128.8% vs GPOR's -5.6%
DVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.05, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.05 vs NOG's 0.60, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, HAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.5% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.9% margin vs NOG's -30.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs NOG's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NOG's 7.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs GPOR's -5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs NOG's -11.3%, ROIC 14.8% vs 10.0% |
NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPOR leads in 3 of 6 categories
NOG leads 0 • BATL leads 0 • DVN leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 134.4x BATL's $165M. GPOR is the more profitable business, keeping 41.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOG's -30.3%. On growth, GPOR holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $1.4B | $165M | $12.2B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $884M | $74M | $5.0B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$623M | $594M | $12M | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | $362M | $39M | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +47.8% | +72.8% | +21.8% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +40.2% | -4.0% | +18.9% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | +41.9% | +7.2% | +17.6% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +25.5% | +23.7% | +16.8% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | +27.3% | -37.0% | -99.9% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +127.7% | +59.0% | -100.0% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NOG and BATL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, GPOR trades at a 86% valuation discount to NOG's 61.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NOG's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HAL's 11.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $3.2B | $47M | $28.2B | $32.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $4.0B | $42M | $35.5B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.38x | 8.32x | -1.28x | 10.80x | 26.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.80x | 6.95x | 12.43x | 8.62x | 16.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.44x | 4.98x | — | 4.79x | 11.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 2.44x | 0.29x | 1.65x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.80x | — | 1.84x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.02x | 11.71x | 1.20x | 9.04x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NOG. GPOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NOG's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs HAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.1% | +32.7% | +14.5% | +18.6% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.3% | +19.8% | +2.4% | +9.1% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.0% | +14.8% | -3.4% | +12.3% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +19.3% | -1.8% | +13.8% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 0.43x | — | 0.57x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $787M | -$5M | $7.3B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $2M | $28M | $1.4B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $789M | $23M | $8.8B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 11.16x | 0.57x | 7.98x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GPOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPOR five years ago would be worth $24,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs GPOR's -5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GPOR at 25.2% vs BATL's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -13.3% | +140.3% | +20.4% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | -5.6% | +128.8% | +52.9% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | +96.1% | -54.3% | -2.0% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.8% | +145.1% | -77.5% | +120.1% | +82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | +145.1% | -72.1% | +99.0% | +16.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | +25.2% | -23.0% | -0.7% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATL and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOG's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAL currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.14x | -1.71x | 0.05x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.62 | $225.78 | $29.70 | $52.71 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.18 | $160.95 | $1.00 | $29.70 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +79.2% | +9.6% | +86.0% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 34.6 | 37.6 | 43.5 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 320K | 16.6M | 15.3M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NOG and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NOG as "Buy", GPOR as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", DVN as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for GPOR (target: $242) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $242.00 | — | $53.78 | $37.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 8 | 2 | 64 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | +0.1% | +100.0% | +2.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.75 | $0.09 | $2.96 | $0.98 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +10.0% | 0.0% | +3.7% | +3.1% |
GPOR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
NOG vs GPOR vs BATL vs DVN vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the stronger pick with 42.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.
3x versus Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. at 61. 4x. On forward P/E, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) delivered a total return of +145.
1%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPOR returned +145. 1% versus BATL's -72. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning NOG is approximately -135% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 113% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is pulling ahead at 42.
5% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gulfport Energy Corporation grew EPS 245. 9% year-over-year, compared to -92. 4% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAL leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL?
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
(NOG) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Halliburton Company — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPOR: 35. 3% to $242. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), NOG (7. 3% yield), DVN (2. 2% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GPOR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NOG or GPOR or BATL or DVN or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, NOG: -34. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NOG and GPOR and BATL and DVN and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NOG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NOG, BATL, DVN, HAL pay a dividend while GPOR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.