Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $3M | $449M | $4.85T | $2.93T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $150M | $422.57B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-105M | $-22M | $160.21B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 69.9% | 62.1% | 60.4% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -74.9% | -13.4% | 32.7% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 64.1x | 28.9x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $173M | $82M | $59.29B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $29M | $30.71B | $86.81B |
NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FiscalNote Holdings… (NOTE) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 282.4 | +182.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, NOTE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
BLZE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 58.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.6%
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 0.97 vs AMZN's 1.12
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs NOTE's -20.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.9x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.97 vs 1.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs NOTE's -119.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs NOTE's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.3% vs NOTE's -97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs NOTE's -40.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.1% |
NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
NOTE leads 0 • BLZE leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 8448.2x NOTE's $88M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOTE's -119.0%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $150M | $422.6B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $4M | $161.3B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$105M | -$22M | $160.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $14M | $73.3B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.9% | +62.1% | +60.4% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -74.9% | -13.4% | +32.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -119.0% | -15.0% | +37.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | +9.0% | +17.3% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.2% | +11.7% | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +41.2% | +81.9% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NOTE and BLZE and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.1x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 3% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.24x vs AMZN's 1.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $449M | $4.85T | $2.93T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $147M | $501M | $4.88T | $3.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -16.26x | 37.07x | 38.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 64.10x | 28.90x | 31.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.24x | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 93.93x | 32.44x | 20.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 3.08x | 12.03x | 4.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 5.05x | 11.80x | 7.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.81x | 66.17x | 381.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-161 for NOTE. NOTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLZE's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs NOTE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -160.9% | -27.2% | +39.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.6% | -11.8% | +27.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -14.1% | +25.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -16.9% | +30.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.98x | 0.14x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | $53M | $28.6B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $29M | $30.7B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $173M | $82M | $59.3B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.58x | -4.31x | 392.15x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $35,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for NOTE. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +160.3% total return vs NOTE's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 55.1% vs NOTE's -78.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -88.1% | +57.8% | +27.2% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.5% | +42.5% | +160.3% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +78.9% | +273.3% | +157.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -62.4% | +251.1% | +70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -62.4% | +1003.5% | +702.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.8% | +21.4% | +55.1% | +37.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOGL is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOTE's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs NOTE's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 2.10x | 1.28x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.20 | $10.86 | $402.00 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $3.26 | $152.20 | $188.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.9% | +68.9% | +99.7% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.7 | 87.6 | 83.5 | 74.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 490K | 1.5M | 28.0M | 45.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLZE as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs 1.4% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.10 | $406.28 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 82 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 7% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 37. 1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Alphabet Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +251. 1%, compared to -99. 8% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus NOTE's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning NOTE is approximately 108% more volatile than GOOGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 98% for Backblaze, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -20. 7% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Backblaze, Inc. grew EPS 58. 6% year-over-year, compared to -660. 2% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLZE leads at 19. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -68. 4% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -38. 9% for NOTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOTE leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) trades at 28. 9x forward P/E versus 64. 1x for Backblaze, Inc. — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 12. 5% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NOTE, BLZE, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), +1004% 10Y return). FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +1004%, NOTE: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NOTE and BLZE and GOOGL and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NOTE (Technology) and BLZE (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NOTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.