Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NOTE
FiscalNote Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
BLZE
Backblaze, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$449M
5Y Perf.-65.2%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.85T
5Y Perf.+182.4%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.93T
5Y Perf.+55.5%

NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NOTE logoNOTE
BLZE logoBLZE
GOOGL logoGOOGL
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureInternet Content & InformationSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$3M$449M$4.85T$2.93T
Revenue (TTM)$88M$150M$422.57B$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$-105M$-22M$160.21B$90.80B
Gross Margin69.9%62.1%60.4%50.6%
Operating Margin-74.9%-13.4%32.7%11.5%
Forward P/E64.1x28.9x31.4x
Total Debt$173M$82M$59.29B$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$29M$29M$30.71B$86.81B

NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NOTE
BLZE
GOOGL
AMZN
StockNov 21May 26Return
FiscalNote Holdings… (NOTE)1000.2-99.8%
Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE)10034.8-65.2%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100282.4+182.4%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100155.5+55.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NOTE
FiscalNote Holdings, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

In this particular matchup, NOTE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.

Best for: technology exposure
BLZE
Backblaze, Inc.
The Growth Play

BLZE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 58.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.6%
Best for: growth exposure
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Income Pick

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 0.2%
  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • PEG 0.97 vs AMZN's 1.12
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Secondary Option

AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGOOGL logoGOOGL15.1% revenue growth vs NOTE's -20.7%
ValueGOOGL logoGOOGLLower P/E (28.9x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.97 vs 1.12
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs NOTE's -119.0%
Stability / SafetyGOOGL logoGOOGLBeta 1.28 vs NOTE's 2.66
DividendsGOOGL logoGOOGL0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+160.3% vs NOTE's -97.5%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs NOTE's -40.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.1%

NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NOTEFiscalNote Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription
93.3%$89M
Other Revenue
3.0%$3M
Advisory
2.2%$2M
Advertising
1.6%$1M
Books
0.0%$10,000
BLZEBackblaze, Inc.
FY 2025
Consumption-Based Arragments
53.1%$77M
Subscription-Based Arrangements
46.9%$68M
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGAMZN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 8448.2x NOTE's $88M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOTE's -119.0%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNOTE logoNOTEFiscalNote Holdin…BLZE logoBLZEBackblaze, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$88M$150M$422.6B$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$54M$4M$161.3B$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$105M-$22M$160.2B$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M$14M$73.3B-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.9%+62.1%+60.4%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-74.9%-13.4%+32.7%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-119.0%-15.0%+37.9%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-21.2%+9.0%+17.3%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.2%+11.7%+21.8%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.0%+41.2%+81.9%+74.8%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NOTE and BLZE and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 37.1x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 3% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.24x vs AMZN's 1.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNOTE logoNOTEFiscalNote Holdin…BLZE logoBLZEBackblaze, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3M$449M$4.85T$2.93T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$147M$501M$4.88T$3.00T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x-16.26x37.07x38.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.64.10x28.90x31.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.24x1.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple93.93x32.44x20.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.03x3.08x12.03x4.09x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x5.05x11.80x7.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.81x66.17x381.09x
Evenly matched — NOTE and BLZE and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-161 for NOTE. NOTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLZE's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs NOTE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNOTE logoNOTEFiscalNote Holdin…BLZE logoBLZEBackblaze, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-160.9%-27.2%+39.0%+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-40.6%-11.8%+27.4%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.1%-14.1%+25.1%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.0%-16.9%+30.3%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.98x0.14x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$144M$53M$28.6B$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$29M$30.7B$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$173M$82M$59.3B$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.58x-4.31x392.15x39.96x
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $35,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for NOTE. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +160.3% total return vs NOTE's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 55.1% vs NOTE's -78.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNOTE logoNOTEFiscalNote Holdin…BLZE logoBLZEBackblaze, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-88.1%+57.8%+27.2%+20.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.5%+42.5%+160.3%+42.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%+78.9%+273.3%+157.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-62.4%+251.1%+70.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-62.4%+1003.5%+702.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-78.8%+21.4%+55.1%+37.1%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOTE's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs NOTE's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNOTE logoNOTEFiscalNote Holdin…BLZE logoBLZEBackblaze, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.66x2.10x1.28x1.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.20$10.86$402.00$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$3.26$152.20$188.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.9%+68.9%+99.7%+97.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10028.787.683.574.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded490K1.5M28.0M45.2M
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: BLZE as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs 1.4% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNOTE logoNOTEFiscalNote Holdin…BLZE logoBLZEBackblaze, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.10$406.28$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts98294
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%+0.9%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NOTE vs BLZE vs GOOGL vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 7% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Backblaze, Inc. (BLZE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?

On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 37. 1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Alphabet Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +251. 1%, compared to -99. 8% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus NOTE's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning NOTE is approximately 108% more volatile than GOOGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 98% for Backblaze, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -20. 7% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Backblaze, Inc. grew EPS 58. 6% year-over-year, compared to -660. 2% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLZE leads at 19. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -68. 4% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -38. 9% for NOTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOTE leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) trades at 28. 9x forward P/E versus 64. 1x for Backblaze, Inc. — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 12. 5% to $306. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN?

In this comparison, GOOGL (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NOTE, BLZE, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NOTE or BLZE or GOOGL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), +1004% 10Y return). FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +1004%, NOTE: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NOTE and BLZE and GOOGL and AMZN?

These companies operate in different sectors (NOTE (Technology) and BLZE (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NOTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NOTE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLZE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NOTE and BLZE and GOOGL and AMZN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NOTE: -27.2% · BLZE: 11.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.