Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NRC vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
NRC vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $440M | $1636.12T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $139M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 55.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | — |
| Forward P/E | 22.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $79M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M |
NRC vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Research C… (NRC) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 43.5 | -56.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRC vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth -4.0%, EPS growth -50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.2%
- 91.8% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -88.6%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +116.8% vs NRC's +45.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs DBVT's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.8% vs NRC's +45.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
NRC vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRC and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $139M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $139M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.0% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $440M | $1636.12T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $515M | $1636.12T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.56x | -0.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.19x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.05x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.20x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 31.26x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.96x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NRC delivers a 57.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $57 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRC's 5.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRC scores 5/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +57.2% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.2% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.65x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $75M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $79M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.82x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NRC and DBVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRC five years ago would be worth $4,800 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,310 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +116.8% total return vs NRC's +45.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 1.1% vs NRC's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.9% | +116.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | +3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.0% | -66.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.8% | -88.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.5% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRC currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.79 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.01 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +72.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
NRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
NRC is the only dividend payer here at 2.51% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | 0.0% |
NRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). DBVT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NRC vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRC or DBVT a better buy right now?
National Research Corporation (NRC) offers the better valuation at 37.
6x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NRC or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, National Research Corporation (NRC) delivered a total return of -52.
0%, compared to -66. 9% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRC returned +91. 8% versus DBVT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NRC or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Research Corporation (NRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 11β — meaning DBVT is approximately 39% more volatile than NRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 6% for National Research Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NRC or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Research Corporation grew EPS -50.
0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NRC or DBVT?
National Research Corporation (NRC) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRC leads at 16. 4% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRC leads at 56. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NRC or DBVT?
In this comparison, NRC (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NRC or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Research Corporation (NRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NRC: +91. 8%, DBVT: -88. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NRC and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NRC pays a dividend while DBVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.