Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Technology Distributors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $35M | $952M | $328M | $6.62B | $9.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $3.09B | $978M | $24.96B | $33.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $73M | $-64M | $214M | $727M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 13.5% | 15.3% | 10.5% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 3.1% | -2.6% | 2.7% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.0x | — | 16.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $147M | $343M | $2.88B | $3.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $916K | $126M | $104M | $192M | $306M |
NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nortech Systems Inc… (NSYS) | 100 | 372.6 | +272.6% |
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
| Methode Electronics… (MEI) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
| Arrow Electronics, … (ARW) | 100 | 274.8 | +174.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 233.9% 10Y total return vs ARW's 218.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 2.58x
- Beta 0.50 vs MEI's 2.14
SCSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.4x)
- 2.4% margin vs MEI's -6.6%
- 4.2% ROA vs MEI's -5.6%, ROIC 7.0% vs -1.9%
MEI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AVT's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
AVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.6%
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
- +65.6% vs SCSC's +20.2%
ARW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 49.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.0%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs NSYS's -8.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs NSYS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs MEI's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs MEI's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AVT's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.6% vs SCSC's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs MEI's -5.6%, ROIC 7.0% vs -1.9% |
NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCSC leads in 2 of 6 categories
MEI leads 1 • NSYS leads 0 • AVT leads 0 • ARW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARW is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.5B annually — 287.2x NSYS's $117M. SCSC is the more profitable business, keeping 2.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEI's -6.6%. On growth, ARW holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $3.1B | $978M | $25.0B | $33.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166,000 | $114M | -$10M | $781M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $73M | -$64M | $214M | $727M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $124M | $43M | $33M | $410M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +13.5% | +15.3% | +10.5% | +11.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +3.1% | -2.6% | +2.7% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +2.4% | -6.6% | +0.9% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +4.0% | +4.4% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +8.8% | -2.6% | +33.9% | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.5% | +5.4% | +2.4% | +12.9% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SCSC trades at a 51% valuation discount to AVT's 29.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCSC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NSYS's 33.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $952M | $328M | $6.6B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52M | $973M | $567M | $9.3B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.64x | 14.47x | -5.26x | 29.40x | 17.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.98x | — | 16.22x | 13.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.70x | 8.43x | 16.39x | 12.44x | 11.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.31x | 0.31x | 0.30x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.14x | 0.47x | 1.41x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.15x | — | 11.47x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCSC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARW delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MEI. SCSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs NSYS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.9% | +8.1% | -9.4% | +4.3% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | +4.2% | -5.6% | +1.7% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +7.0% | -1.9% | +6.0% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +7.7% | -2.1% | +7.9% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.16x | 0.50x | 0.57x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | $21M | $240M | $2.7B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $916,000 | $126M | $104M | $192M | $306M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $147M | $343M | $2.9B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.23x | 11.00x | -0.63x | 2.80x | 7.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NSYS and AVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NSYS five years ago would be worth $20,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,474 for MEI. Over the past 12 months, AVT leads with a +65.6% total return vs SCSC's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVT at 27.0% vs MEI's -36.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.5% | +11.1% | +39.6% | +64.6% | +67.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +20.2% | +43.7% | +65.6% | +64.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | +64.5% | -74.0% | +105.0% | +61.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.2% | +34.3% | -75.3% | +94.1% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +233.9% | +9.7% | -52.9% | +132.4% | +218.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | +18.0% | -36.2% | +27.0% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NSYS and ARW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NSYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MEI's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARW currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs NSYS's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.48x | 2.14x | 1.27x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.39 | $46.25 | $10.78 | $84.72 | $196.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.50 | $33.76 | $4.88 | $44.25 | $101.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +93.8% | +85.8% | +95.4% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 60.3 | 73.9 | 76.9 | 75.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 204K | 494K | 1.0M | 560K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MEI and AVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SCSC as "Hold", MEI as "Hold", AVT as "Hold", ARW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.9% upside for SCSC (target: $43) vs -32.1% for ARW (target: $129). For income investors, MEI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.21% vs AVT's 1.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 | $8.50 | $79.33 | $128.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 6 | 20 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.2% | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.57 | $1.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +11.2% | +0.5% | +4.6% | +1.7% |
SCSC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MEI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
NSYS vs SCSC vs MEI vs AVT vs ARW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(ARW) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS). ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW?
On trailing P/E, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW?
Over the past 5 years, Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS) delivered a total return of +103.
2%, compared to -75. 3% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSYS returned +233. 9% versus MEI's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Methode Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning MEI is approximately 332% more volatile than NSYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(ARW) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -8. 0% for Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrow Electronics, Inc. grew EPS 49. 9% year-over-year, compared to -119. 7% for Nortech Systems Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NSYS leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW?
ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARW leads at 3. 0% versus -2. 3% for MEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEI leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCSC: -0. 9% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW?
In this comparison, MEI (6.
2% yield), AVT (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NSYS, SCSC, ARW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSYS or SCSC or MEI or AVT or ARW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), +233. 9% 10Y return). Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NSYS: +233. 9%, MEI: -52. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSYS and SCSC and MEI and AVT and ARW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; MEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARW is a small-cap deep-value stock. MEI, AVT pay a dividend while NSYS, SCSC, ARW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.