Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NTIC vs HWKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
NTIC vs HWKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $76M | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-306K | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4438.9x | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $160M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $5M |
NTIC vs HWKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 778.6 | +678.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTIC vs HWKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.38, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.86x
HWKN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs NTIC's 39.6%
- 6.0% revenue growth vs NTIC's -1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs NTIC's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (42.3x vs 4438.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs NTIC's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HWKN's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs HWKN's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.6% vs NTIC's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs NTIC's -0.3%, ROIC 15.9% vs -5.6% |
NTIC vs HWKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTIC vs HWKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 12.3x NTIC's $86M. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTIC's -0.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $172M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$305,653 | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.8% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NTIC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 41.4x trailing earnings, HWKN trades at a 99% valuation discount to NTIC's 4438.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4438.89x | 41.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 42.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 7.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-0 for NTIC. NTIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWKN's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HWKN scores 6/9 vs NTIC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +19.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $155M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $160M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 10.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,931 for NTIC. Over the past 12 months, HWKN leads with a +40.6% total return vs NTIC's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs NTIC's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.5% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | +318.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.7% | +391.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | +765.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +61.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTIC and HWKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HWKN's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HWKN currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs NTIC's 79.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.03 | $186.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $115.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 169K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NTIC and HWKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NTIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs HWKN's 0.42%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
HWKN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NTIC vs HWKN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTIC or HWKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) offers the better valuation at 41. 4x trailing P/E (42. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTIC or HWKN?
On trailing P/E, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the cheapest at 41. 4x versus Northern Technologies International Corporation at 4438. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTIC or HWKN?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -40. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +765. 9% versus NTIC's +39. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTIC or HWKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Hawkins, Inc. 's 0. 98β — meaning HWKN is approximately 161% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 35% for Hawkins, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTIC or HWKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -1. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawkins, Inc. grew EPS 12. 3% year-over-year, compared to -99. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTIC or HWKN?
Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus -7. 1% for NTIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTIC leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NTIC or HWKN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 4% for Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN).
08Is NTIC or HWKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +39. 6%, HWKN: +765. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NTIC and HWKN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NTIC pays a dividend while HWKN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.