Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRSP | -90.0% revenue growth vs NTLA's -100.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CRSP | Beta 1.25 vs NTLA's 1.52, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CRSP | +36.9% vs NTLA's +36.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRSP | -21.7% ROA vs NTLA's -49.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Intellia Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing CRISPR-based gene editing therapies for genetic diseases. It generates revenue primarily through research collaborations and licensing agreements — notably with Regeneron and Novartis — while advancing its own pipeline of in vivo and ex vivo therapies. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary CRISPR/Cas9 platform technology and intellectual property portfolio for genome editing.
CRISPR Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing transformative gene-editing therapies for serious diseases using its proprietary CRISPR/Cas9 platform. It generates revenue primarily through research collaborations and milestone payments from partners like Vertex Pharmaceuticals — with its lead therapy for sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia now approved and generating product sales. The company's key advantage is its foundational CRISPR/Cas9 intellectual property and extensive expertise in developing ex vivo gene-edited cell therapies.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CRSP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NTLA leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CRSP and NTLA operate at a comparable scale, with $37M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | NTLAIntellia Therapeu… | CRSPCRISPR Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $37M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$332M | -$556M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$413M | -$488M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$355M | -$303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | -15.8% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NTLAIntellia Therapeu… | CRSPCRISPR Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.62x | -9.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1608.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRSP delivers a -25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-61 for NTLA. CRSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTLA's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTLA scores 3/9 vs CRSP's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | NTLAIntellia Therapeu… | CRSPCRISPR Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.5% | -25.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.0% | -21.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -27.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$62M | -$141M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $348M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $207M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CRSP five years ago would be worth $4,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,152 for NTLA. Over the past 12 months, CRSP leads with a +36.9% total return vs NTLA's +36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRSP at 6.8% vs NTLA's -30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NTLAIntellia Therapeu… | CRSPCRISPR Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.6% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.6% | +36.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.7% | +21.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | -53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +326.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.0% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CRSP is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRSP currently trades 76.6% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NTLAIntellia Therapeu… | CRSPCRISPR Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.25 | $78.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.90 | $30.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 66.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NTLA as "Buy" and CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.6% upside for NTLA (target: $19) vs 8.1% for CRSP (target: $65).
| Metric | NTLAIntellia Therapeu… | CRSPCRISPR Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.38 | $65.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 97.46 | -2.5% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 96.18 | -3.8% |
CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) returned -54% over 5 years vs Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)'s -78%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | $16M | $0.00 | -100.0% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | $5M | $4M | -32.0% |
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue grew from $16M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR. CRISPR Therapeutics AG's revenue grew from $5M (2016) to $4M (2025) — a -4.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | -192.0% | -9.0% | +95.3% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | -4.5% | -165.7% | -3587.9% |
CRISPR Therapeutics AG's net margin went from -4% (2016) to -166% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | -0.91 | -3.81 | -318.7% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | -1.89 | -6.47 | -242.3% |
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.91 (2016) to $-3.81 (2025). CRISPR Therapeutics AG's EPS grew from $-1.89 (2016) to $-6.47 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. generated $-355M FCF in 2025 (-49% vs 2021). CRISPR Therapeutics AG generated $-346M FCF in 2025 (-176% vs 2021).
NTLA vs CRSP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTLA or CRSP a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NTLA or CRSP?
Over the past 5 years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) delivered a total return of -53.8%, compared to -78.5% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). A $10,000 investment in CRSP five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +326.8% versus NTLA's -37.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NTLA or CRSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.25β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.'s 1.52β — meaning NTLA is approximately 21% more volatile than CRSP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 14% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NTLA or CRSP?
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) is the more profitable company, earning 0.0% net margin versus -165.7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 0.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTLA leads at 0.0% versus -189.3% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 0.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — NTLA or CRSP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is NTLA or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.25), +326.8% 10Y return). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 1.52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRSP: +326.8%, NTLA: -37.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between NTLA and CRSP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.