NTNX vs HPE

For growth investors, Nutanix, Inc.

(NTNX) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 1% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE). Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) offers the better valuation at 70. 7x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is actually cheaper at 12.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) delivered a total return of +95.

5%, compared to +60. 5% for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HPE returned +269. 0% versus NTNX's +24. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutanix, Inc.

(NTNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 1. 62β — meaning HPE is approximately 99% more volatile than NTNX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutanix, Inc.

(NTNX) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus 14. 1% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutanix, Inc. grew EPS 227. 5% year-over-year, compared to -102. 3% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTNX leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nutanix, Inc.

(NTNX) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 0. 2% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTNX leads at 6. 8% versus 4. 8% for HPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTNX leads at 86. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) trades at 12.

3x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Nutanix, Inc. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTNX: 29. 8% to $59. 64.

In this comparison, HPE (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. NTNX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutanix, Inc.

(NTNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81)). Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTNX: +24. 1%, HPE: +269. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NTNX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HPE pays a dividend while NTNX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.