Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NTR vs AVD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
NTR vs AVD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $35.51B | $83M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.90B | $523M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.27B | $-46M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $12.93B | $191M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $700M | $12M |
NTR vs AVD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) | 100 | 217.1 | +117.1% |
| American Vanguard C… (AVD) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTR vs AVD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 248.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.3%
- 64.0% 10Y total return vs AVD's -73.1%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.07, Low D/E 51.1%, current ratio 1.34x
AVD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 3.0%
- Beta 1.17, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.77x
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 13.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs AVD's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs AVD's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (51.1% vs 99.5%) | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, vs NTR's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.6% vs AVD's -31.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs AVD's -7.1%, ROIC 8.0% vs 1.3% |
NTR vs AVD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NTR vs AVD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 51.4x AVD's $523M. NTR is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVD's -8.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.9B | $523M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.0B | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.3B | -$46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | -$41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +29.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +53.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AVD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NTR's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVD's 10.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35.5B | $83M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $47.7B | $262M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.57x | -1.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.97x | 7.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.49x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTR delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-22 for AVD. NTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVD's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTR scores 8/9 vs AVD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | -21.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.2B | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $700M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.9B | $191M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.44x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTR five years ago would be worth $14,121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,592 for AVD. Over the past 12 months, NTR leads with a +34.6% total return vs AVD's -31.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTR at 7.6% vs AVD's -45.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | -23.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.5% | -83.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.2% | -84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.0% | -73.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.6% | -45.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVD's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTR currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs AVD's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.07x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.36 | $5.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.03 | $2.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +49.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NTR and AVD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NTR as "Buy" and AVD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 484.2% upside for AVD (target: $17) vs 14.1% for NTR (target: $84). For income investors, AVD offers the higher dividend yield at 3.03% vs NTR's 3.01%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $84.25 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.22 | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +1.7% |
NTR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NTR vs AVD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTR or AVD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTR or AVD?
On forward P/E, American Vanguard Corporation is actually cheaper at 7.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTR or AVD?
Over the past 5 years, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -84. 1% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTR returned +64. 0% versus AVD's -73. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTR or AVD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus American Vanguard Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning AVD is approximately -1715% more volatile than NTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 99% for American Vanguard Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTR or AVD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -5. 9% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutrien Ltd. grew EPS 248. 5% year-over-year, compared to 61. 1% for American Vanguard Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVD leads at -5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTR or AVD?
Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -9. 7% for American Vanguard Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTR leads at 14. 5% versus 1. 3% for AVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTR leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTR or AVD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Vanguard Corporation (AVD) trades at 7.
7x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Nutrien Ltd. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVD: 484. 2% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTR or AVD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Vanguard Corporation (AVD) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 3. 0% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR).
09Is NTR or AVD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTR: +64. 0%, AVD: -73. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTR and AVD?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AVD is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.